<p>In an effort to compare these schools to each other, I'm just trying to nail down the stereotypical character of these LACs. I know that these first tier LACs are all intellectual places that provide amazing education, but I think each place certainly has its own character and charm that distinguish them from each other. So I would appreciate it if anyone could help me. Right now, I'm applying to Amherst, Middlebury, Carleton, Grinnell, and Williams, but I'm considering adding more, possibly Wesleyan and Swat and CMC. This is what I have so far: </p>
<p>Swarthmore - intense and competitive atmosphere, very academic-oriented, weak sports(no football team), overwhelming workload </p>
<p>Middlebury - preppy culture, strong language & IR program, fairly WASPy, "everyone is J.Crew catalogue good-looking" --> ???? </p>
<p>Wesleyan - artsy, politically active, lots of lesbians and gays and bi stuff, very liberal, diverse and bigger student body</p>
<p>Carleton - laid back, down-to-earth, intense and fast trimester system, midwestern nice and friendly, quirky and nerdy</p>
<p>Williams - preppy, classic New England feel, lots of Varsity athletes</p>
<p>Grinnell - middle of nowhere cornfield, perfect place to just study and prepare for Ph.D, friendly atmosphere</p>
<p>CMC - party(school gives money for alcohol), jockey, future leadership focus, strong politics and econ, the consortium, </p>
<p>...
Just please tell me anything you know about these schools in terms of its personality. Feel free to comment on your school or any others you are familiar with. I'll take in anything you say and appreciate it.
Of course, these are over-simplified and "stereotypical" notions that I heard through words of mouth and research...
But please help me find my fit!
(or yours)</p>