<p>“Policies differ, so you need to find out how this would work at each school.” </p>
<p>The above is really the answer. You need to look at the policies of the school and the terms of the award and what is included in it.</p>
<p>That’s why when you read that a school meets 100% of need, you have to be wary since 1) They define the need 2) Self Help can be included in the need package which means student employment and loans 3) Outside scholarships can be absorbed 4) Stafford loans can be included as part of the awards.</p>
<p>The most generous schools will not include Stafford loans, any loans or PELL in the package, nor will it have required student employment or workstudy in the package. They may also let you keep your scholarship money which will only reduce federal funds as required (such as eligible Stafford loans) Other schools will go after all of that.</p>
<p>It is possible to get a package that will include the $5500 that nearly all students that fill out the FAFSA and get a SAR from them, also include any PELL grant money, (that’s actually typical) and also require summer employment and give a work study award as well. That can pose a problem when the family/student is counting on summer employment, work during the school year, and the Stafford direct loan to go towards the EFC. We were entitled to zero in financial aid, and used the Stafford option as well as student funds from summer employment and work during the school years to meet college costs and to provide a bit of a buffer. IT’s really a hit when a family that comes up in need has all of that swallowed up as financial aid.</p>
<p>Some schools even have the gall to present the Parent PLUS loan as part of the package. </p>
<p>In some typical packages from those schools that are considered generous in that they guarantee to meet all need, I have seen the subsidized part of the Stafford included as part of the package, but not the unsub. So there is a lot of mix and match one can see.</p>
<p>it’s a big problem when student employment is assumed and the student lives in an area where there are no jobs and/or has transportation issues that are an impediment. I mentioned in another thread how my cousin has one vehicle, has an hour’s drive to work and has to be there by 6 AM. His kids don’t even have driver’s licenses because of the additonal cost it would add to their insurance plus he hasn’t the time and energy to do anything in that regard. The kids get to school via school buses or friends’ rides. They would have to cobble together a ride system if they found a job, and considering how little they will likely net from working, it’s a tough go. </p>
<p>In the OP’s specific scenario, using info given, from outside awards, that student would get $4k put towards his self help requirement and get $4k “free money” that can go towards the parental contribution. The Stafford loans are looked at in a whole different scenario because they are federal loans. They FAFSA EFC comes into play here and the school’s official COA. The NEED is defined as the difference between the two. You then subtract out the school aid package and the scholarship money. that is the net need figure. The student can take out for freshman year Stafford loans up to $5500 as long as the COA minus scholarship and need package amounts don’t exceed that. However for the Subsidized part of the Stafford (up to $3500 can be subsidized) there has to be need to justify that. </p>
<p>The school, unless it uses FAFSA only for financial aid determination, has a need figure that does not necessarily match what FAFSA defines as need, so when applying federal (and some state) funds towards need, you have to go back to the FAFSA EFC. COA minus EFC will equal the FAFSA need, and then any grants, scholarships, aid, workstudy given to the student will be subtracted from that need figure. Those are federal laws governing how the loans can be distributed and the school has to go by them.</p>