<p>lol sorry guys, I’ve been in paper writing mode this week and havent had a chance to check back. glad to see the conversation and advice continues regardless :)</p>
<p>~Gay life on campus?</p>
<p>well from what I can tell the dating pool is a lot more incestuous, which you’ll probably find at any small school just because of that - small schools have smaller populations of queer folks (sorry in advance if the term offends btw, it’s what we use at Swat and what I’m used to). that said, SQU (swarthmore queer union) is a really important group for a lot of queer ppl on campus, both as a social venue and and as a support system. once I had a spec ask me if people were “out and flamboyant” or “pretty low key” about their sexuality, I said I think you’ll find a really solid, even mix here - a range of people who are really political about being queer, really involved in SQU and SQU activities, to people who are not closeted but are less public about their sexuality (and, I’m sure, a substantial number of questioning or unsure or in the closet folks as well). In addition to SQU there’s small group for people who are questioning, persuasian for queer asian students, COLORS for queer people of color, and others that I’m forgetting. queer students are definitely present on campus… sorry I can’t give you more than that :-/</p>
<p>~1. Several people have told me that if you’re not at the honors program at Swarthmore, it’s very difficult to get into a good law school. This is a big concern for me since I’d eventually like to get a JD. How much harder is it to get into a good (U.S. News top 10) law school if you’re not in the honors program</p>
<p>I unfortunately have no valid perspective on this since I am in honors, and only have one friend applying to law schools who isn’t and she hasn’t heard back (and afaik didn’t do well enough on the LSAT to be applying to T10 anyway). Sorry! I can’t imagine they care though. Law school applications is FAR, FAR, FAR more focused on GPA/LSAT than on “community involvement” and “how interesting you are” than undergrad admissions (barring extremely good stuff like fulbright fellowships, peace corps, curing cancer, etc). I would rather take a 3.7+ with no honors program than a 3.6 or less with honors, and adcomms likely would too. (not that the two are mutually exclusive by any means)</p>
<ol>
<li>More on the honors program. How hard is it to get into, and how much harder are its classes than normal classes?</li>
</ol>
<p>Not hard, just have a respectable gpa (IIRC the cutoffs range from 3.3-3.5 for the majors that even have cutoffs). Classes aren’t harder really. They’re more reading, but that’s because they’re double credit seminars - you’re getting credit for 2 classes worth of work, so obviously it’s more work than a single credit class. The substance of the work itself isn’t noticeably more difficult though. And if you’re taking two honors seminars, you’re in class 2 days per week so you should have more than enough time outside of class to get the work done.</p>
<p>~3. Most people tell me Swarthmore is challenging. I’ve had people tell me it’s like the U Chicago, and that graduating with even a 3.5 or 3.6 GPA is very rare. Just how hard is Swarthmore? More specifically, since I’m a humanities/social sciences guy, how hard are those areas?</p>
<p>Can’t compare to UChicago since I’ve never been there. That said, I think most of my friends have 3.6+ GPAs…as far as I know at least. I mean, it all depends on what you think is hard. I probably spend around 40 hours per week in the library when it’s NOT finals period. Reading and writing papers isn’t <em>hard</em> for me per se, but it does take a long time and it requires time management. I took five credits last semester and that was certainly overwhelming, but also not the norm. That said, I’m a social sciences and humanities girl as well - when I took general chemistry, yes it was hard (for me). Microeconomics was also hard for me… statistics was hard but that was because I took too early of a class and never got enough sleep the night before, but when it came down to preparing for the final, the material wasn’t intrinsically difficult. It also depends on the professors. I have an A+ on my transcript for a class that had no graded assignments except for a final 20-page paper, which I researched and wrote in 2 days and which was riddled with typographical errors. Is that the exception? of course, but he does teach here and you could take a class with him and boost your gpa. On the other hand, the constitutional law class assigns over 300 pages of reading per week and you’re expected to have it done. that’s probably hard. i took a seminar for which I had to write a paper every other week. hard? depends. tiring? definitely. Starting a language from scratch was hard for me, but it’s gotten easier as I’ve become more proficient. And, I was fortunate enough to attend a high school that prepped me well for study skills and solid writing abilities (i know you can easily tell from my posting here…not haha). So I came in with a pretty strong background, which isn’t true for everyone. And, my workload has increased a lot since freshman year because of taking higher level classes, seminars. etc. I hope that’s helpful, I can keep going but I don’t want it to get too long.</p>
<p>~4. Finally, is Swarthmore’s difficulty the result of professors grading harshly, lots of work, or both?</p>
<p>Both. </p>
<p>The last thing I’ll say though is that as someone applying to law school and as someone who knows a lot of fellow pre-law ppl and recent grads in LS, while swarthmore students applying to law school MAY get a tiny bump for grade deflation, it isn’t much. do not bank on that! if you’re set on T10 or bust for law school, do your best at Swat, take classes you like and excel at, and gun for that 3.7+ because that will be your ticket. ace the LSAT and you’ll have T3 at your fingertips. </p>
<p>I hope that helps, though I feel my answers were insufficient this time around. let me know if anyone has followups or more questions! :)</p>