<p>This is the sort of thing where an accountant would be useful. You pay what percent of what you took out of your IRA in taxes? If you borrow, after deducting the interest what percent are you paying . That is one comparison. Also, are you being knocked into another tax bracket, losing any benefits from being upper income, such as possible no interest loans on the Staffords? If one of your kids applies for financial aid in a subsequent year, how is that additional income affecting his aid package and other scholarships and programs with a need component?</p>
<p>An example: You take out $16K to pay for your Student 1. That incurs that much more income that year which can result in an additional $4K in taxes at a 25% marginal rate. Yes, your tax credits might wipe that out, ,but they would have still kicked in and further lowered your taxes with out that additional $16K kicker. Your second child decides to apply to some schools that guarantee to meet 100% of need. So that second year when you are filling out the PROFILE and FAFSA, you have to report $16K more in income which is going to bring up that EFC and PROFILE contribution up another $4_6k at least. Even if a school is not meeting all need you don’t know if they’ll throw in some money as financial aid and at what thresh hold or what formula they use. My cousin’s son got $5K from his state school in need based money. If their income had been up another $17K, who knows if they would have even given him anything. You only know what happens in the circumstances you report so, it’s really impossible to guess. Had the family, borrowed the $16 instead, the interest on it would have been about half what the tax on it was, and not assessed for another year. If the kid took out the loan and it qualified as need, $3500 of it would have been interest free and remained so until after he graduated, and then assessed at whatever his tax rates happen to be as he repays it. </p>
<p>There are merit within need or need within merit awards that a student qualifies if he simply has financial need. Amount not specified. Just have to have need. You don’t know if your kid(s) are being checked to see if they qualify. </p>
<p>My kids borrow the full Stafford they can each year, since we want to borrow but they get a lower interest rate than we do, it’ll help their credit to have the loan pai timely way and they might be able to deduct the interest as we are not able to do so. If they had any need at all, I would certainly have them borrow because that is an interest free loan while they are in school, not to mention a great interest rate thereafter for the subsidized loans. </p>
<p>The other thing is if you take out student loans and die, the loans are done. No one owes. So they have that bit of insurance to them. My friend’s DH was in his 60s when they had kids. He took out a slew of loans, including some very huge amounts for one of the girls to go to Columbia journalism school, and passed away after paying only a small amount on them. Had he used his assets in his pension/IRA whatever accounts, his family would be poorer by 6 figures. </p>
<p>Again, I’d prefer a tax professional to say, one way or the other, as it is often not simple to make these decisions. There is no way i would want to increase our taxable interest I can see. But it is certainly possible that this is the best way to go for some people.</p>