Tax aspects of Scholarships and fellowships:

<p>There seems to be constant questions reqarding these areas.Accordingly, enclosed is a letter written about 6 months ago about this. I have also added some additional information after the letter for some further elaboration. Hopefully, this will end these questions:</p>

<hr>

<p>Scholarships (and fellowships) are generally tax-free, whether for elementary or high school students, for college or graduate students, or for students at accredited vocational schools. It makes no difference whether the scholarship takes the form of a direct payment to the individual or a tuition reduction.
However, for the scholarship to be tax-free, certain conditions must be satisfied. The most important are that the award must be used for tuition and related expenses (and not for room and board) and that it must not be compensation for services.
Tuition and related expenses. A scholarship is tax-free only to the extent it is used to pay for (1) tuition and fees required to attend the school or (2) fees, books, supplies, and equipment required of all students in a particular course. For example, if a computer is recommended but not required, buying one wouldn't qualify. Other expenses that don't qualify include the cost of room and board, travel, research, and clerical help.
To the extent a scholarship award is used for nonqualifying items, it is taxable. The recipient is responsible for determining how much of the award was used for qualified tuition and related expenses so as to be tax-free. You should maintain records (e.g., copies of bills, receipts, cancelled checks) that reflect the use of the scholarship money.
Scholarship award can't be payment for services. A scholarship isn't tax-free if the payments are linked to services that your child performs as a condition for receiving the award, even if those services are required of all degree candidates. Thus, a stipend your child receives for required teaching, research or other services is taxable, even if the child uses the money for tuition or related expenses.
Returns and records. If the scholarship is tax-free and your child has no other income, the award doesn't have to be reported on a return. However, any portion of the award that is taxable as payment for services is treated as wages, and the payor should withhold accordingly. Estimated tax payments may have to be made if the payor doesn't withhold enough tax. Your child should receive a Form W-2 showing the amount of these "wages" and the amount of tax withheld, but any portion of the award that is taxable must be reported, even if no Form W-2 is received.
Your child's award can have the following impact on these related tax issues:
(1) You should still get dependency exemption. Your dependency exemption for your child shouldn't be threatened by the scholarship. To claim an individual as your dependent, you must provide more than 50% of his support. Since education is a support item, to the extent that education costs are paid by an outside source, the amount of support you are providing could fall below 50%. However, a special rule provides that educational costs covered by a scholarship (or fellowship) for a dependent who is a child of the taxpayer (but not for other dependents) aren't included in the calculation of total support.
Example. Ellen's parents provide $8,000 towards her support and she receives a $10,000 college scholarship. If the scholarship were included in Ellen's total support, the parents' $8,000 wouldn't be more than 50% of her support ($18,000) and they wouldn't qualify to claim her as their dependent. However, since the scholarship isn't included in her support, the parents qualify.
(2) Any taxable scholarship amounts should increase your child's standard deduction. As noted above, to the extent scholarship funds are spent on room, board, or other nonqualifying expenses, the award is taxable. However, it is treated as "earned income." This means if the student is being claimed as a dependent by his parent, and using the standard deduction he or she may qualify for a higher standard deduction.
If an individual is a dependent, his or her standard deduction is limited (in 2004) to the greater of (a) $800, or (b) the sum of $250 plus the individual's earned income. But the standard deduction can't be more than the regular standard deduction ($4,850 for single taxpayers for 2004). So even though part of a scholarship is taxable, it may be "covered" by the standard deduction.
Example. Tim is a dependent of his parents. His only income is $3,000 he received as part of a scholarship which is taxable because it was applied to cover his costs of room and board. Since the $3,000 is treated as earned income, Tim is entitled to a $3,250 standard deduction which reduces his taxable income to zero.
(3) The tax-free scholarship may limit other higher education tax benefits you or your child may be entitled to. If your child receives a tax-free scholarship and his or her higher education expenses also qualify for any of the following credits, deductions, and exclusions, the expenses taken into account in computing any of these other benefits must first be reduced by the tax-free amounts used to pay the expenses:<br>
Hope and Lifetime Learning credits.
Deduction for higher education expense.
Deduction for interest on student loans
Coverdell ESA distribution exclusion.
Qualified tuition (529) plan distribution exclusion.
Savings bond interest exclusion.<br>
In other words, neither you nor your child may claim a credit, deduction, or exclusion based on expenses paid with tax-free scholarship funds.</p>

<p>However, educational assistance provided by a government unit or an Indian tribe may be tax-exempt under the "general welfare exclusion" ( ¶ J-1480A). Thus, educational assistance payments provided by a corporation organized under Indian tribal law to tribe members with family income below the national median were excludable as general welfare payments. But payments to tribe members with family income equal to or greater than the national median were taxable unless they were "qualified scholarships"</p>

<p>Elaboration:
I. Gross income doesn't include any amount received as a qualified scholarship ( ¶ J-1232) by an individual who is a candidate for a degree ( ¶ J-1245) at an educational organization ( ¶ J-1244). 1.1 Thus, nondegree candidates cannot exclude scholarship income from gross income. 2</p>

<p>1.1 Code Sec. 117(a) ; Prop Reg § 1.117-6(b)(1).
2 H Rept No. 99-426, PL 99-514, p. 102.</p>

<p>II, In addition,The recipient of the scholarship or fellowship grant is responsible for determining whether the grant is, in whole or in part, includible in gross income. 3.1. Thus, you can't trust whether the sponsoring scholarship categorization of taxability.</p>

<p>3.1 Letter ruling 200226005</p>

<p>Moreover,The grant need not be limited by its express terms to tuition and course-related expenses. An otherwise qualified scholarship is excludible (taking into account any other excludible grant to the individual) up to the aggregate amount of tuition and related expenses incurred by the individual for the period of the grant. But a grant which by its terms cannot be used for tuition and related expenses or which is earmarked for other purposes (such as room and board) isn't excludible. 5 </p>

<p>5 Conf Rept No. 99-841, Vol. II, PL 99-841, pp. II-16; Prop Reg § 1.117-6(c)(1).
illustration: Taxpayer, a degree candidate, receives a $2,000 scholarship, with $1,000 specifically designated for tuition and $1,000 specifically designated for living expenses. Taxpayer's tuition is $1,600. Taxpayer may exclude $1,000 from income, but the other $1,000 designated for living expenses must be included in income.</p>

<p>3.1 IRS Letter Ruling 200226005.</p>

<p>III. In addition:scholarship prize won in a contest is not a scholarship where there is no requirement that it be used for educational purposes. But if the winner can only use the prize money to pay tuition, the prize is a scholarship governed by Code Sec. 117. </p>

<p>IV. What is covered:</p>

<p>An otherwise qualified scholarship is excludible up to the amount used for qualified tuition and related expenses, see ¶ J-1232. Qualified tuition and related expenses means:
(1) tuition and fees required for the enrollment or attendance of a student at an educational organization described in Code Sec. 170(b)(1)(A)(ii) 6 (see ¶ J-1244).
(2) fees, books, supplies and equipment required for the courses of instruction at the educational organization. 7</p>

<p>6 Code Sec. 117(b)(2)(A) ; Prop Reg § 1.117-6(c)(2)(i).
7 Code Sec. 117(b)(2)(B) ; Prop Reg § 1.117-6(c)(2)(ii).
Under proposed regs, to qualify for exclusion, the fees, books, supplies, and equipment would have to be required of all students in the particular course. 8 </p>

<p>8 Prop Reg § 1.117-6(c)(2).
Illustration: S is a scholarship student at a university where he is enrolled in a writing course. "Suggested" supplies for the writing course include a word processor, but students in that course aren't required to buy word processors. Under the proposed regs, S wouldn't be able to include the cost of a word processor in calculating his exclusion. 8.1</p>

<p>8.1 Prop Reg § 1.117-6(c)(6), Ex (1), Ex (1). </p>

<p>Part II of this post will be right under this</p>

<p>Part II, Tax aspects of scholarships and Fellowships continued:</p>

<p>V. Payment for services:</p>

<p>The exclusion from gross income for qualified scholarships and the exclusion for qualified tuition reductions don't apply to that portion of any amount received which represents payment for teaching, research, or other services by the student which are required as a condition for receiving the qualified scholarship or qualified tuition reduction. Thus, cash stipends for services aren't excludible as a scholarship even if the money is used to pay tuition. For a statutory exception to this rule for certain health professions scholarship programs.</p>

<p>As an example: . "Scholarships" given to contestants in the Miss Georgia Pageant. The "scholarships" are forfeitable and are granted only to those contestants entering into a contract by which they agree to abide by the contest rules and to make required public appearances. The Tax Court concluded that these "scholarships" are compensatory in nature, representing a quid pro quo for services rendered under the contest contract, and are designed to attract high quality contestants to the pageant. </p>

<p>One interesting bit of information deals with athletic scholarships:
In the following case, the grants were held to be primarily for the education and training of the recipient and not to be compensation for services:
. Athletic scholarship awarded to a college student by university that expects but doesn't require him to participate in a particular sport. 35
35. Rev. Rul. 77-263</p>

<p>VI. Recordkeeping requirements for qualified scholarships.</p>

<p>To be eligible to exclude a qualified scholarship, proposed regs would require that a recipient maintain records that establish amounts used for qualified tuition and related expenses. Upon request by IRS, a recipient may satisfy this requirement by providing copies of bills, receipts, cancelled checks, or other documentation that clearly reflect the use of the money. Also, IRS may require a recipient to provide documentation that establishes receipt of the grant, notification date of the grant, and the conditions and requirements of the particular grant. 46</p>

<p>46 Prop Reg § 1.117-6(e).</p>

<p>For further information, See IRS publication 520, which is pretty goods insofar as IRS publications go.</p>

<p>I hope this helps.</p>

<p>Wow.
Thanks.</p>

<p>Wow. Good work (and a lot of it). Thank you.</p>

<p>Your welcome. I am wondering if the moderators can make this a sticky posts so that people won't keep asking questions about this.</p>

<p>TaxGuy:
A clarification, please. You had mentioned:
'Example. Ellen's parents provide $8,000 towards her support and she receives a $10,000 college scholarship. If the scholarship were included in Ellen's total support, the parents' $8,000 wouldn't be more than 50% of her support ($18,000) and they wouldn't qualify to claim her as their dependent. However, since the scholarship isn't included in her support, the parents qualify.'</p>

<p>What if Ellen :) gets a full-tuition scholarship, plus outside scholarships totalling (say) $5000? Her college expenses (apart from tuition, books and fees) are $12000, mostly for room and board. Her parents provide the remaining $12K - $5K = $7K . In this situation, would she still qualify as a dependent on her parents' tax return? Would she have to file a tax return of her own as well?</p>

<p>Sorry Optimizerdad. I rarely address specfic tax questions and don't take clients due to liability reasons.</p>

<p>TaxGuy:
No problem. Thanks for the info you've posted.</p>

<p>taxguy~</p>

<p>Thanks for providing this!! ~berurah</p>

<p>Yes, please make this a sticky. I will probably forget it when we need it!</p>

<p>For what it's worth, I just called the IRS help line, waited for 20 minutes and finally got their response to the situation posted in #6 above.</p>

<h2><em>NOTE</em> I make no claims as to the accuracy/validity of this answer; it's simply what I was told by the IRS during my phone call to them.</h2>

<p>o Ellen would not qualify as a dependent on her parent's tax return. The IRS view (as stated to me) is that Ellen's total expenses were ~$35K for tuition + $12K for room & board. Of this, she received ~ $35K from the full-tuition college scholarship, $5K from outside scholarships and $7K from her parents. $7K is not > 50% of ( 35K + 12K), so she doesn't qualify.</p>

<p>o Ellen needs to file a tax return for 2004, since most of the $5K from outside scholarships (the part that wasn't used to pay for books + fees) counts as taxable income.</p>

<p>Optimizerdad, I will give you a tip that I say in both my lectures and in my book. You can't rely on anything that the IRS says on the phone. They are not bound by it.</p>

<p>I would strongly suggest that you seek a tax opinion by a CPA or tax attorney. If they are wrong, IRS will usually waive penalties.</p>

<p>However,if you are going to call the IRS, there is one situation that will result in waiving of penalties. You must keep a log of your call noting:</p>

<ol>
<li>Name of person on the phone</li>
<li>Badge number of the person</li>
<li>Date of the call</li>
<li>Time of the call</li>
<li>Question asked</li>
<li>Answer given</li>
</ol>

<p>Keep this in a file. If you get audited and have this information, IRS will generally waive penalties. However, I prefer that you get a formal written tax opinion from a tax professional.</p>

<p>Optimizerdad, you may want to make another phone call to the IRS!</p>

<p>In general terms, I think that it should be BETTER for the students to be considered non-dependent. The key publication to check this status is the following: <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p501.pdf%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p501.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>There are five tests of dependency but all do not apply to full time students. The basic test is the support test. The list of acceptable support items does include education. So far so good, and the agent questioned by O-Dad was on the right track. However, had she read the pages the bottom of pages 14 and the top of page 15, she should have noted that scholarships are EXCLUDED from the support amounts. This is obviously stated to help determine who can claim a dependent between taxpayers. </p>

<p>Since most parents continue to provide support for about 1/3 of the year and continue to provide permanent lodging during the year, it is entirely possible that the IRS could take the position that students on full-time scholarships are still dependents. </p>

<p>The good news is that the amount of taxes is probably too small for them to really worry about the potential difference in taxes. To determine the best avenue, you'll need to play with the various scenarios and balance deductions and potential education credits. Once that done, simply document your position. Also, it is important to check with the school and see how they report the scholarships disbursements and tuition charges: it may not follow the same calendar as outside scholarships. In my case, it understated income in 2004 and will overstate income in 2005.</p>

<p>taxguy - I immediately emailed your posts to my own personal "taxguy" (DH). So helpful and much appreciated. Very, very glad to see it put up as a sticky.</p>

<p>quoting Xiggi:</p>

<p>"Since most parents continue to provide support for about 1/3 of the year and continue to provide permanent lodging during the year, it is entirely possible that the IRS could take the position that students on full-time scholarships are still dependents."</p>

<p>This was the advice given to me by my accountant. The taxes (for only one semester this year since he is a freshman) were immaterial and the difference was really a wash. We'll have to look at it more closely next year when it covers a full year's scholarship plus a significantly more expensive summer travel expense.</p>

<p>When I started the other thread it was based on a single line in the IRS publication 970 that stated:</p>

<p>" An athletic scholarship is tax free if it meets the requirements discussed above." </p>

<p>This followed a multi-page explanation of the taxes associated with merit based scholarships. I have to admit that it was a knee jerk reaction based on seeing the pedestal that athletes are regularly put on starting at their first demonstration of athletic prowess. This pedestal and the entitlement that often follows has lead to a culture of athletes who are always being looked out for and protected from harm, given prefererential treatment in the classroom with free tutors and more, and who have developed a sense of invincibility because someone will always be there to clean up behind them and watch their backs. This week's Sunday Times Magazine article about AU also pointed out this disparity in the treatment of athletes and how others are simply left behind to sink or swin on their own.</p>

<p>Having read and observed all the wonderful achievements of so many of the kids on CC I was simply frustrated with the system, and thought that I was seeing yet another example of the silver platter that is associated with college sports to the detriment of the hard working kids who have as someone said earlier "busted their butts in school" and somehow often still seem to draw the short straw.</p>

<p>Eadad, for what it is worth, for 2004, I will be a dependent of my parents, but it will change in 2005. </p>

<p>The main reason is that my entire tuition bill for 2004-2005 is considered a 2004 expense but 50% of my scholarships were paid in January 2005. I called the IRS four times on this issue and the verdict was 3-1 to endorse the position to follow the tax form sent by the school AND remain as a dependent for this year. It was also 3-1 for the change in status in 2005. The different opinion came from NOT taking the position that while the scholarships money can be backed out for the tuition portion, you still have to consider the room and board expenses for the support test. </p>

<p>Also, based on discussions with several other recipients of scholarships, it appears that the compliance is ... very low.</p>

<p>Xiggi:
<em>Thank you</em> for the specific reference to Pub.501, along with the pg.#s. I called the IRS again, armed with the specific line from p.15 that 'Scholarships received by your child if your child is a full-time student.... should not be considered as part of total support'. The IRS agent agreed, and said that my child (oops - Ellen) could indeed be claimed as a dependent on our tax return. He also mentioned Publication 17, p.33 as another reference.</p>

<p>I've made a record of all details of this call - date, time, agent name + badge#, as TaxGuy had suggested.</p>

<p>Thank you, Taxguy. Really appreciate this post (as well as your other ones!) Of course it helps that you are such a great supporter of the University of Miami, where my S is going!! ;)</p>

<p>Congrats on your son being accepted into U. of Miami. It's a fine school and has great school spirit and lots to do. Tell your son to study and keep his eyes of those gorgeous, scantilly clad girls who hang out by the pool. Remember, the school is in Miami.</p>

<p>Eadad, athletic scholarships are an exception in that despite the "expects but doesn't require" clause to have them qualify as scholarships for tax purposes, the reality is that an athlete who does not perform will not get a renewal of his scholarship. Injury is an exception that had to be made otherwise...., well, they shoot horses, don't they? Some of these athletes, though they may be getting a terrific deal, are under tremendous pressure to perform. In addition, in the big time sports, many are truly out of their element to make it academically, as the completion statistics show. Those who are against athletic scholarships are not necessarily feeling that way because of jealousy of the athletes, but in the terrible unfairness of the way this system treats all of these children. </p>

<p>Thanks, so much Taxguy. Wow is right. What a gem of a post!I can tell that you are at the top of your game. Thank you so much for sharing all of this with us.</p>