<hr>
<p>testmasters</p>
<h2>this word list covers unfamiliar words that WILL 100% sure be on your reading passages</h2>
<p>someone told me this link, but what aer teh chances they would have all the vocab for the jan test? and i'm taking a rescheduled jan test, so that means they use a different one right?</p>
<p>I do not think they have the words that will be on your reading passages; at least I did not encounter any. They only deal with words that appear in sentence completion and analogies.</p>
<p>This is just from my experience.</p>
<p>seriously? i'm taking a rescheduled jan test? do you think it'd still apply?</p>
<p>No, because the retake will be a different recycled test. Some of the words will work, but it won't have a 99% effect. The Sunday 23rd test is the same that you will be taking, so find somebody who took that and see how much it helped them, or maybe get answers/words from them.</p>
<p>oh wait, so my new SAT test (its not really a retake but a postponed test date), will be completely different from the one everyone took on JAN 22nd? and when you say recycled, you mean it was used years ago?</p>
<p>How does one establish the 90, 99, or 100% accuracy? </p>
<p>If a TM list contains 200 words, does it mean that 198 words of the list appeared on the test to be 99% accurate? What about the words that appeared on the tests and were not listed? </p>
<p>Just wondering how one would measure such as lofty claim?</p>
<p>The Testmasters list contained 391 words.</p>
<p>"The Testmasters list contained 391 words."</p>
<p>So, and from those 391 words, how many words appeared on the 2 SAT tests given this weekend? </p>
<p>Again, how do you establish the criteria to claim XX% accuracy, be it 90 or 99%?</p>
<p>judging from the questions/answers people posted, one of the tests had a TON of those words. i dont know about 99%, but enough to warrant a look at the list. unfortunately for me, i had the other test which had maybe 1% of the words- was not worth my time studying the list.</p>
<p>does anyone know about what the test will be like for people postponed?</p>
<p>
[QUOTE]
So, and from those 391 words, how many words appeared on the 2 SAT tests given this weekend? </p>
<p>Again, how do you establish the criteria to claim XX% accuracy, be it 90 or 99%?
[/QUOTe]
</p>
<p>On my test, every right answer was a word on the list. For instance.</p>
<p>Play:Going
a) Soporific:Something
b) Humerous:Foreboding
c) Mysterious:Solomnic
d) Jollity:Enchanting
e) Jingoism:Rarefy</p>
<p>None of the words from (a),(b),(c), or (d) appeared on the Testmasters list, but (e) (which is the right answer), did appear on the list. Hence, going through the analogies and sentence completions was merely a task of looking for words that you memorized from the list and double checking them for fit.</p>
<p>I do not know how Testmasters can claim 99% accuracy, but what I do know is that it saved me.</p>
<p>god damnit, how am i gonna know which list to use for my feb 5th postponement date</p>
<p>The testmasters list worked on the native american test and thats what matters. I don't know about 99%, but it worked and thats the bottom line. I can credit my soon to be 800 (or 790) verbal to this.</p>
<p>
[QUOTE]
I can credit my soon to be 800 (or 790) verbal to this.
[/QUOTE]
</p>
<p>Hopefully, I can too.</p>
<p>is anyone sure that the feb 5th. postponement test is not the same as the jan 22nd one?</p>
<p>what is the bridge between jingoism and rarefy?</p>
<p>Excaliber, I cannot think of any such bridge:
Jingoism: Someone with extreme nationalism.
Rarefy: To make refined.</p>
<p>It is that 99% of the words on the SAT are on that list, not that 99% on the list are on the SAT.</p>
<p>awhhhhh, does anyone know what sat they'll use for feb 5th postponement?</p>
<p>What list! Where!? lol</p>