<p>This seems like a good place to talk about this - </p>
<p>My jr D so far has good safeties and matches/high matches. All of the schools she’s applying to have great theater programs. She’d mostly like a BFA; with those auditioned schools the idea of low reach/high reach changes (no such thing as a safety). So we have lists for both.</p>
<p>Up to now, her high matches were lovely LACs, usually test-optional, because her early testing was very weak. She really liked Bard, Sarah Lawrence and Lawrence University (in that order), and a few others like them. She likes city schools, too, mostly with the BFA, but she does have to get in academically, as at Boston University. </p>
<p>So now on her first sitting, she made a solid B+/A- type ACT, 27, to go with her solid B+/A- GPA, 3.6 UW with 2 APs so far (3 more next year) and several honors level classes. </p>
<p>A school she’d really liked when she’d researched and we drove through it was Vassar. It has a wonderful theater BA and has always seemed to be a terrific possible reach for her. Now it’s a lot more of a possibility, especially if she can get a couple more points onto her ACT in a second sitting. It’s not her “I have to go” school, but it does give her an ego boost to think she really can add it to her list now.</p>
<p>Or should she, really? I looked at the Vassar threads yesterday, just out of curiosity. Man, it was the total CC thing - “I only have 780, 800 and 720, but I am the student rep to our state legislature, etc., etc.” I read through this past year and saw that they take all types, but it makes me wonder if she really wants to be in that kind of atmosphere, both in applying and when she gets there.</p>
<p>I know there’s a 3.6 applying to top schools thread; maybe that’s a better place for this question. But I’m wondering how you all are thinking about the reaches, about their fit, about what your kids really want. My D is very comfortable with her B and A/B student friends, tends to be a little nervous around the kids she thinks are “smarter” than she is because of their top grades and scores … yet lately getting into NHS and getting some other little honors, and now this quite good ACT have helped her see that she isn’t so different from them. </p>
<p>And that’s just stats - she holds her own intellectually, the kind of kid who leads the discussion in class, but then only got an 86 on the test. I can see her blossoming where the atmosphere is at a high level; she’s definitely not hit her peak yet. But she looks for smarts in lots of ways, and also would be comfortable at a school where she’s mid-upper level in things like scores and GPA, as long as the kids and profs were stimulating and creative. </p>
<p>I’ll let her do what she wants, and she knows a reach is just a reach. But would she really go? And is that kind of “value” really that important to her? I’m not used to this kind of thinking, was a “go for the highest possible academic rigor” type, as was H and D1. I think she sees things very differently, although I know she’s drawn to intellectual intensity, or else she wouldn’t like Bard and Sarah Lawrence so much. But they don’t select anywhere nearly so much on stats and status.</p>
<p>It’s not obviously a decision we need to make yet, but I’m just wondering how I should travel this particular journey with her. I find myself thinking, well maybe she won’t get in … but then why set her up for another “see I can’t cut it” situation? I suppose I should just let it go and see what happens. But this is different from “let her follow her dream;” she just wonders if it’s worth throwing it into the mix, but I know as time goes on she might find it was getting to be a bigger hope than she’d expected and then be crushed unnecessarily.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>