Many of these criticisms stem from legitimate concerns so I want to address them. I made these points as a checklit for questioning one’s work and not as an instruction manual to be taken verbatim.
A) It’s important to look at both sides of an issue and be able to view it from a neutral objective standpoint. In a persuasive essay, you should certainly use arguments from the other side so that you can either build on them or refute them. You don’t want one paragraph arguing in favor of gun control and then one paragraph against it. If you are trying to persuade, you don’t want to argue a muddled perspective.
B) The paragraph size is not a firm law but rather a way to test for flaw. I agree that if you write a good paper in general, it won’t be a problem. But if you spot that your paragraphs are either giant walls of text or an array of small scattered ones, it may be a sign that you aren’t focused.
C) As far as Grammar apps go (I use Grammarly), the people who are against them need to realize one thing. They’re NOT a religion. You’re not supposed to blindly swallow every suggestion they offer you and make every change it asks of you. If half of the suggestions are bad and half of the suggestions are good, then you apply the half that helps you and avoid the others. If you do that, it’s only to your benefit. Use discretion. Also, this is mostly a temporary phase just to correct mistakes you often make without realizing early on, and then once you get better at writing, you won’t need it as much.
D) As far as the location of the thesis, yes it does depend on the essay type. In a persuasive essay, I would argue that it’s imperative to say your main point early on. If you’re writing an essay arguing the evidence for global warming, you may decide to save the carbon tax proposal for later on, but explain your position on the issue early on. Reading a paper paragraphs in and not knowing where the reader is going with it is needlessly confusing. The reader needs to know why your facts are important and not just that you have them. In a research paper, in which you are expressing pure information, you might not have a thesis, but you should at least provide some context into HOW you’re examining it. Okay, you’re writing a whole research paper about dolphins. What aspect of dolphins? And is there a particular reason why it’s important? In a personal essay, the lesson or ephiphany of the overall experience may come at the end, but it can be useful to foreshadow, set the tone and maybe introduce an idea you will eventually return to.
E) Personal expression is something you have to be really careful with. If it’s a personal essay, creative writing or it otherwise specifically asks you about YOUR perspective on something, be expressive. If it’s a persuasive essay, a degree of emotional urgency can be allowed. However, if it’s a research paper or a write-up that otherwise is neutral, don’t get cute with it. You don’t want it to be a blog where you get sarcastic, comedic, throw a few double entendres in there and such. The point of those kinds of papers isn’t to show how clever or expresive you are. You don’t want to be Roger Ebert or some columnist on Salon. It’s purely about the knowledge. Writing an academic paper from a non-academic tone can be a lot like going to an office job in a Hawaiian shit.
F) Don’t mistake my idea of a thesis needed to be explained in simple terms as a way of saying that you need to dumb down your essay. Moreso, that the main point needs to stand out. For example, for one of Galileo’s works, you could say “He proposes that the Sun is at the center of our galaxy”. His work is not simple, but the thesis is clear. When you ask a reader to tell you the overall point of your paper, they should get the main point - and not just state some of your maller arguments.
G) With citations, I didn’t mean to set a hard rule. That was a mistake on my end. But you need to do it for legitimacy, no question asked. If the assignment is smaller, like a short answer, do quotes. But if you don’t have them, it does look like you’re just talking.
.