<p>UCLA:</p>
<p>Depends on what part of campus where one is situated:</p>
<p>North campus to mid campus, the former around the Sculpture Garden (James Spader’s favorite spot) and the latter around the original quadrangle, gorgeous. Looking down Janss steps toward the lower part of campus, and looking across from the steps to Bel Air, amazing. I remember walking up Bruin Walk on those hot days when the coeds turned it into a catwalk… priceless.</p>
<p>South campus, where all the future doctors, dentists, pharmacists, engineers, mathematicians, physicists are … bu, and I don’t mean Boston University. But this is fitting as the students there should like teh utilitarian structures because they are future scientitsts, and should make them feel at home.</p>
<p>Stanford:</p>
<p>The word that comes to my mind is, “sterile.” I don’t know if it’s the influence of the students that seem to encompass the university, but the buildings there, though pretty uniform in architecture, and nice from overhead shots that have made the rounds here, don’t really inspire. Maybe they had coeds that looked like ASU’s, I might feel differently, lol.</p>
<p>UCSB:</p>
<p>Agree with Dunn, a lot of the buildings there are quinitessential “utilitarian.” Nice lagoon… location, location, right on the bluffs.</p>
<p>USC:</p>
<p>Amost a square block of flat campus bordered by four streets… On the outside, you see a lot of ugly parking structures, etc… but inside it’s not bad, a lot of newer utilitarian stuctures, and the older are mixtures of falling-aprart older, with some beautiful traditional structures like the main(?) library - Mudd?, and philosophy(?) building. Incredibly cramped, though, only about 200 acres…</p>
<p>Cal:</p>
<p>I liked it more than Stanford. Sather Gate is the Bruin Walk of Cal. Not as nice a visual feast as at UCLA walking through the gate, and UCLA doesn’t have the transient problem that Cal has. But nice and hilly like UCLA.</p>