The U.S. History Discussion Thread (November - December)

<p>@the geezer - i dont remember it either</p>

<p>maybe he’s referring to the question I posted above</p>

<p>“What was the answer to the question “which represents industrial unionization”? Was it all unions in the 1930’s?”</p>

<p>i just looked it up on wikipedia and it’s “organizing method through which all workers in the same industry are organized into the same union”</p>

<p>Ok so I think the unions in the 1930s should be the answer then</p>

<p>and what about the picture of a house? what do you think it meant?</p>

<p>reflected European architecture</p>

<p>Actually, now I’m starting to think that automated production WAS associated in the 19the century, and hence, not the right answer. Does anyone remember putting anything else?</p>

<p>Well if by “automated production” if they were referring to assembly lines, then it’s a bit controversial</p>

<p>I found online that the first assembly started in like the 1870s (meatpacking) but I’m not really sure if that counts. If they were referring to the manufacturing of industrial goods (like cars), then the assembly line started in the 1900s</p>

<p>I still think it’s automated production but I can’t remember any of the other answer choices.</p>

<p>Anyone want to complie a list of answers?</p>

<p>I thought it was an ok test, much easier than the first time I took it.
Hopefully 700+
got 640 last time bahhhh</p>

<p>“I couldn’t decide between the answer that was like “they were mostly tories” and something about invading canada because i could have sworn both were false.”</p>

<p>I put Canada as the answer</p>

<p>any other opinions on this?</p>

<p>this is the question about what was not part of the second constitutional convention btw</p>

<p>Does anyone know?</p>

<p>Does anybody remember the question that said “avoid entangling alliances”? Was the answer to avoid political alliances?</p>

<p>@thegeezer</p>

<p>I dont exactly remember the question but I have a hunch that I put that as one of my answers</p>

<p>btw: For the second constitutional convention one, I believe the answer was “invade canada”.</p>

<p>Which book did you use to study for the test, and what was your score??</p>

<p>I used AMSCO and Crash Course and Kaplan but idk what my score is (coming out the 24th)</p>

<p>i still don’t get how “they were mostly tories” at the second constitutional convention true.</p>

<p>someone said that there was something to do with Canada earlier… perhaps because it was British owned at the time? I don’t really know but they certainly weren’t tories.</p>

<p>@stix</p>

<p>I dont believe it’s true either but I dont think it had anything to do with Canada either.</p>

<p>I know, exactly.</p>

<p>During the test I couldn’t decide between the two. Yet I couldn’t think of any way in which they were tories. Could they have passed something do with Canada (some military measure? I forgot what it was anyway)-perhaps and I just didn’t know about it (maybe they just didn’t go through with it?). But were they Tories? Isn’t that more obviously wrong?</p>

<p>I think they did have some plan to invade Canada. They did later in the war of 1812, another war with England. The Canadian border was a point of contention for some time. Although I’ve never actually heard of such a plan, it makes way more sense for that to be true then that they were Tories.</p>

<p>Yeah stix I believe u are correct</p>