<p>I got a 2200 SAT score 730 reading, 760 math, 710 writing (most colleges will look at the 1490 math and reading</p>
<p>my parents want me to take it until its 2300.</p>
<p>Is that really necessary?</p>
<p>their idea is that since im asian i will be compared with other asians and so my score can't be just "better than most" it has to be "better than most asians"</p>
<p>Is this right? I don't think so... but plz confirm</p>
<p>Your score is competitive, but the question you have to ask yourself is whether it is even possible for you to score 2300 or above, whether you have hit your limit.</p>
<p>Spending any more time on the SAT may cause your score to fall; that, or the gain might be negligible.</p>
<p>Your parents are right, but that doesn’t mean you are capable of scoring 2300+.</p>
<ol>
<li>Thanks for telling everyone my score </li>
<li>My goal originally was a 2200, it’s not MY fault I got a 2300. I just did what I could, and it happened to be better than I thought it was. </li>
<li>I think people here are too uptight about their scores. A 2200 is a great score. There is virtually no difference between a 2200 and a 2300 to an adcom. Everyone needs to just RELAX</li>
</ol>
<p>They’re [Ivies] going to take the best of each race, considering that want diversity. They aren’t going to compare a 2200 black female to a 2200 white female, because the difference is vast. Female 1 (black) is off-the-charts for her race, whereas female 2 is superb, but not ridiculous.</p>
<p>Moral of the story: You are in the most competitive pool. However, the best way to improve your app is to not become the stereotypical asian applicant. Get an EC that stands out, or do something different. If you are just the regular Asian applicant, then that 2200 will look subpar compared to the 2300s. However, most adcoms would rather an Asian with great ECs and a good personality with a 2200 than a 2300 with typical Asian ECs (math olympiad, science bowl, acadec, etc).</p>
<p>^^^jw do they differentiate between chinese, japanese and koreans (for asians)
why is the bar higher for them?
do they group all asians (chinese,japanese,korean,vietnamese, philipino, indian) under “asian”?</p>