Free speech in the workplace with consequences and free speech are not one and the same.
Wait, you mean thereās nuances and limitations on free speech?
The truth hurts.
-
If you enjoy your job, ignore the CEOās behavior especially if the CEO is eccentric - embrace quirkyness and loosen up a tad.
-
The only thing that can/should be a source of distraction is internal cultural issues because that really impacts business.
-
If you have an employee open forum and the majority of the questions revolve around politics instead of the why the company is hemorrhaging money - pray for salvation.
There certainly is on CC such that I am obligated to avoid debateš
Internal cultural issues are not the only things that can impact a business. Sometimes, a business can be impacted by external perception of its politics. For example, one hotel chain is now commonly associated with a particular politician, so travelers looking for hotels may choose or avoid it on that basis.
My point was on āinternal distractionā not on customer demand. Employees, like customers, can choose other options at will.
Agreed.
Mixing work and politics creates a hostile work environment. Recently, five Tampa Bay Rays players refused to wear a pride flag patch on their uniforms, and they were publicly shamed for not participating. It is easy to imagine how the SpaceX situation served the same purpose. Elon was on the mark for nipping this in the bud.
Itās really a shame that calls for ābeing more inclusiveā is seen as being POLITICAL.
Kinda like Colin Kaepernick not only being shamed, but was not ever able to find work again. The NFL nipped that one in the bud too.
Doesnāt sound like good advice for the flight attendantā¦
So howās the Twitter deal going?
Is it still āon holdā while our world-favorite āfree speech absolutistā is fighting the good fight to allow everyone to speak freely except when itās something he doesnāt like?
Business owners establish internal cultures top down not bottom up. Donāt want to sign up to a culture move on. Plenty of jobs out there eager to hire every activist employee they can. Right ?
Especially for a āfree speech absolutistā who has made āfree speechā his raison dāetre.
For Elon, itās true except when he doesnāt like the speech. Thatās kind of the point of why he is absurdā¦
In any event, where is his great Twitter deal? Is it on hold?
Free speech as a service is not the same as internal discourse and business culture.
And if employees do not like the company culture they are free to change jobs, if they donāt like the ceo they should move. If instead they choose to attack the company and the ceo I have no problem if they are fired. In a business setting you may choose to fight the culture and the ceo but you will most likely loose.
Culture can be established top down or bottom up. Just depends on the business. Thereās no one right way. Hereās just one example of articles on the internet.
My issue is now specifically limited to the self-proclaimed āfree speech absolutistā and his apparent bid for Twitter, which he put āon holdā.
Beyond that, being a free speech absolutist means being a free speech absolutist in every context. Especially where Elon and his minions donāt like inclusion included in his alleged free speech absolutism, that kindaā says it all.
Elonās company. Elonās culture. If he decides he wants out of the deal thatās fine too. His call, not the employees.
And that must include sexism too.
He may possibly lose his best employees too.
Love the timing. Letās see how it goes.