I’ve gotten accepted into all of these schools (Pratt for Duke and CAS Cornell). Part of the indecision about making a final decision on where to go stems from my indecision about what exactly to study as an undergrad to reach a certain career path.
Initially, I would like to study physics or engineering as an undergrad, mostly because I think I would have the most fun in those areas. Physics and engineering are “ideologically attractive” to me; I like how pure physics is as a science and how applicable certain types of engineering are to entrepreneurship and startup culture, which I am interested in as well (think Elon Musk, Salman Khan, Zuck, etc.) However, I still would like to end up working in the financial services industry; management consulting, i-banking, etc. Economics and finance are my secondary interest. Workers in those fields benefit much from an undergraduate science degree and the associated quantitative skills, and besides, I’ll at the very least generate enough profit for me to retire as a physics teacher or something. To summarize my career interests, I’m looking for some vague combination of physics/engineering and econ/finance that is flexible enough to allow me to pursue some kind of graduate degree in physics or MBA while also allowing me to jump into some sort of financial services career right away if I so choose.
For UChicago, I’m mainly worried about the emphasis on theory-based classes as opposed to pre-professional styled courses. From what I’ve heard, banking jobs are much easier to come by with a degree form Duke or Cornell; those two schools have that powerful name-recognition factor on Wall Street and elsewhere in the industry. Apparently UChicago kids are often seen as “nerdy” and lack the interpersonal skills for client interaction. I’m not sure if this is actually true, but the perception of the school from employers holds some weight in itself. Moreover, the lack of engineering may limit my career options, and the severe grade deflation/competitiveness/general crappy weather and “fun aversion” are some drawbacks of questionable merit. Although I didn’t mind the social scene that much when I visited, and just going by pure rankings, Chicago is obviously great for econ and decent for physics.
Meanwhile, Duke has mediocre rankings in all of econ/engineering/physics and student culture that I might not fit in with (how fare Asian Indians in the South?) but I know that Pratt’s engineering and possibly an additional econ major at Trinity, combined with the Duke brand, is enough to land me some stellar career opportunities, especially on the East Coast and definitely Wall Street.
Finally, I think Cornell is in the middle of everything: good name recognition for career ops, reasonably high physics/econ rankings, and very diverse student culture (mostly on account of its size). Also, it offers me a chance of switching into something like engineering physics (#1 in the country apparently), or its engineering school in general. Drawbacks include: being less desirable by employees on account of high acceptance rate, being in the middle of nowhere (though I hear parties are pretty rad), and shitty weather. I feel like this is my best option at this point though; it’s a good balance.
Thoughts?