<p>If you're middle class or poor, UCLA can very well be more expensive than USC. USC meets about 99% of financial need, while UCLA doesn't come close to that. UCLA including room and board is 18,000+. So if your EFC from FAFSA is 8,000 (middle class or so) than USC would cost you around $8,500-9,000 while UCLA would be about 13,000-14,000. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I put up a pretty good estimate.</p>
<p>Another good thing about USC over UCLA is that you can be more flexible. With UCLA you're limited to Econ or Biz Econ, while at USC you can choose many different fields within Business Administration. Management Communication, Management and Organization, Marketing, Finance/Business Economics, Information Systems, Operation Management, and Accounting...which is ranked top 5 in the USA. Within these majors, there are also even more detailed concentrations. Examples: Accounting Information Systems, Corporate Finance, Financial Analysis & Valuation, General Financial Management, Investments and Financial Markets, Real Estate Finance, Real Estate and Construction Management, Real Estate Development, Management Consulting, Leadership Development, Strategic Management, Global Management, Advertising and Promotion Strategy, Sales Strategy, Global Marketing, Product and Brand Management, Distribution Management, Food Industry Management.</p>
<p>At USC you'll get alot more individual attention, get into the classes you want and need, and enjoy an ELITE football team. The Alumni network will also help out a ton as well. The whole "USC isn't nationally recognized as an elite school" will soon fade away. USC is improving at a scary pace, and the word is spreading. More valedictorians from all over the USA are choosing USC every year.</p>
<p>Also, UCLA is 95% californian which is lame if you ask me.</p>
<p>It's all about your preferances in the end, but I would choose USC if I were in your situation.</p>