<p>Wildcatalum re: GSAS v Law, etc. </p>
<p>Ah, I see. You seemed to be making a statement about “Harvard”–and all of Harvard. I merely stated that from “my perspective” such a generalization should not be made. Different departments/schools will have different peers. Not sure why one would consider this assertion “deluded.” But, hey…</p>
<p>I am curious about your apparent deep familiarity with Harvard’s med and law schools, as the two institutions are, as you know, quite different; indeed, they’re located in different cities. So I’m mildly interested to hear that they share the same opinion with regard to neighboring midwestern universities.</p>
<p>The bigger issue, though, is this: No one cares. No one cares where you went to college, much less where you were admitted to college. Villanova, Chicago (oh, sorry UChicago), Princeton, Penn State. It doesn’t matter where you went. Just what you do. </p>
<p>The admissions offices at the elite schools (and even sub-elite) don’t want you to know this. So they play on normal adolescent insecurities to create the frenzy, then stick you with a student loan tab you’ll be paying for the rest of your working lives. Lol.</p>
<p>Chicago (oops, UChicago) is late to the game, but now playing it beautifully. Think about it: For all intents and purposes, it’s the same university I attended almost 10 years ago. Same professors, same courses, same campus. When I applied, nobody wanted to go there. (I think they accepted 50% of their applicants.) Today, I see people on these boards getting into hysterics over their chances for admission. </p>
<p>What’s changed? Not much more than the marketing targeted at 'lil kiddies like you.</p>
<p>It doesn’t take long for the obsessions of high schoolers to look like an awkward joke (midway through September of freshman year for me). That’s why, believe it or not, most folks don’t measure themselves or the value of their education against the fashion whims of adolescent America.</p>
<p>Bye for now!</p>