@collegerigged, out of an abundance of curiosity, what data points and standards are you using to determine which applicants are “qualified” vs. “unqualified” for admission to UT? You seem to be indicating, describing holistic admissions as “fishy”, that there is some uniform standard of qualification that is universally accepted that colleges are suddenly not adhering to. In reality, it reads as though you are applying your own standards of admission to anecdotal cases of students in your own acquaintance, or who post on public forums, without anyone having the benefit of knowing the full details of their admission application. Well, with the exception of the colleges that they applied to, that either did or didn’t admit them.
UT (like most other colleges) determines, based on many data points (not just the ones that you personally deem most important, or that are slanted in your favor, or that seem predictive to you) who is “qualified”. Then, UT determines who of those qualified applicants will actually get in, because there is not room for every single “qualified” applicant. Auto admits are qualified. The holistic review applicants that are granted admission are “qualified”. UT has both a high retention rate, and a fairly high graduation rate. Those two data points, for prospective students and their families, is indicative of UTs success in admitting students who succeed.
The college admission game is tough on ALL applicants. Outside of mom and dad saying “no”, it’s one of the earlier real life scenarios that teach young adults, in concrete terms, that we don’t always get what we want, even when we’ve been steady, true, worked hard, performed well, etc… Every great young person can’t get a “Yes!” from UT or any where else. There is simply not enough room. I suppose that it’s easier for some to try to ‘qualify’ a rejection or redirection by disparaging those who gained acceptance, suggesting that they practically stole something from those who didn’t. But, views like that don’t reflect the reality of college admission at all. There are always, no matter how good you are, how smart you are, how hard you worked, how talented you are, etc…, both triumphs and heartbreak. After college, it’s the professional world, where highly qualified applicants don’t always get the job either.
Note that my student is a junior in high school. As things stand now, he would gain auto admission to UT IF he decides to put UT on his list. He’s qualified, because the State of Texas has set the standard that he has met and exceeded. That’s not why I’m saying this, and not why I pop in to read this thread every few weeks. Several of my neighbors have seniors who have applied to UT, and I like to see when admission waves are happening. We do a little celebratory thing in our community as students get accepted to various colleges. There has already been some triumphs and heartbreaks in my circle. One, in particular, you may find interesting. She ended up in the top 10%, but she missed auto admit. She is an accomplished musician (two instruments and composition), and has an SAT score over 1500. She’s a student body president, she has many volunteer hours that align her love of sharing music with those in need. In short, she’s a wonderful young woman, who is talented and hard working. She was denied admission to UT, and her parents consider offers to other campuses to be an insult. Conspiracy? Not so much.
While I couldn’t say for certain, since I’m not an admission officer with UT, I can tell you that one data point in her application was absolutely cringeworthy, and it wasn’t her stats (and no, she’s not a felon either). Neither she nor her parents (both Texas Exes) think that it’s a big deal. Her parents are complaining loudly, and to anyone who will listen, that every unfair and biased thing under the sun caused their daughter to be robbed of her rightful acceptance to UT. They even went so far as to imply that UTs acceptance of minorities hurt her chances. She was also rejected from an elite university that has exceedingly low acceptance. Her parents are perplexed about that too, seeming truly shocked that there could possibly be other applicants as accomplished as their child. In all of their rantings, never once do they mention or consider the cringeworthy issue that likely (probably) impacted her prospect for admission. They focus on her “stats” as evidence of her deservedness, as if those who have been or will be admitted didn’t deserve it as much as their kid. It’s unfortunate, because the only thing she’s being robbed of is perspective and the opportunity to persevere without entitlement. But, it’s her parents that are robbing her, not the deserving (as evidenced by UTs acceptance) students who gained admission by UTs standards of qualification.