Unsure Engineering Student, Princeton, Harvard & Cal

<p>I must agree with some of the above sentiments. I would strongly advise against engineering and say that the finance fields would be more lucrative. Any worthwhile member of the financial industry is strong enough in math to be an Engineer, but they make more money, and lets be honest - that is important. I am a real life engineer with a real life engineering degree, and I must advocate that if you can go to Cal, Harvard, or Princeton, that you should NOT study engineering. It is the lowest rate of return on your educational investment.</p>

<p>I noticed a lot of the above posts mentioning that engineers from MIT end up taking Finance Jobs. This is telling of the fact that there are more high end oppurtunities in finance than there are in engineering. Don't get me wrong - I love engineering, it is a lot of fun. You just have to be aware that engineering school is VERY difficult. The finance students have a blast while you toil away on your C++ code on saturday nights. If you have a strong desire to be an engineer - go to Cal. If not, still go to cal, but study Finance or business or something of the sort. Plus, Berkeley is a nice town.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I must agree with some of the above sentiments. I would strongly advise against engineering and say that the finance fields would be more lucrative. Any worthwhile member of the financial industry is strong enough in math to be an Engineer, but they make more money, and lets be honest - that is important. I am a real life engineer with a real life engineering degree, and I must advocate that if you can go to Cal, Harvard, or Princeton, that you should NOT study engineering. It is the lowest rate of return on your educational investment.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Well, let me calibrate this statement slightly. I think finance students actually work fairly hard. Granted, probably not as hard as the engineering students do, but still, a lot harder than the students of certain other majors out there. There really are some majors in which you can do very very little - literally not show up to class and not do any work for weeks at a time and still graduate. I suspect that finance students still work harder than the average student at most schools.</p>

<p>Secondly, not everybody, even finance students, will actually get a finance job. Finance hiring tends to be highly arbitrary - where even the students with the best GPA's may not get an offer. A lot of it has to do with social skills, schmoozing, and general "feel", and if you don't have that ability, you're probably not going to get hired no matter how well you do academically. In contrast, in engineering, hiring is far more clearcut. If you have top performance, you're going to get hired by somebody. Not necessarily by a great firm, but you're going to get hired by somebody. Heck, even if you don't do that well, you're probably still going to get hired by somebody. It may be a mediocre engineering company and it may take you awhile to find the job but at least you'll get hired. </p>

<p>The point is, engineering is a * safe * major. At every school - Harvard, MIT, etc. - there are plenty of students who want finance jobs who don't get them. So at least with an engineering degree, you have a backup career. </p>

<p>However, I think it should be pointed out that the 'quality' of your engineering school doesn't really seem to matter much in terms of hiring. The truth of the matter is, students who graduate from elite engineering schools, frankly, don't make that much more than students coming out of lower-ranked engineering schools, once you factor out geographic cost-of-living differences. </p>

<p>For example, compare the engineering salaries for students coming out of Berkeley and San Jose State. These schools are pretty close to each out (about an hour away) so the comparison washes away geographic differences. Notice how, with the exception of EECS and CS, Berkeley engineers don't make THAT much more of an average salary compared to SJState engineers. {And keep in mind that the Berkeley CS figures are skewed upwards because CS is an impacted major that you have to apply to get into, which means that the major basically cuts off the tail end of students who presumably would have lowered the salary figures if they had been allowed into the major, whereas SJSU allows anybody into the major}. The upshot is that the market doesn't strongly reward engineers for going to better schools. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.careercenter.sjsu.edu/download/SalarySurvey2005to2006.pdf%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.careercenter.sjsu.edu/download/SalarySurvey2005to2006.pdf&lt;/a>
<a href="http://career.berkeley.edu/CarDest/2006Majors.stm#salary%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://career.berkeley.edu/CarDest/2006Majors.stm#salary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>
[quote]
If you have a strong desire to be an engineer - go to Cal. If not, still go to cal, but study Finance or business or something of the sort. Plus, Berkeley is a nice town.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Well, I would say that you don't want to be an engineer, then like I said before, you should almost certainly choose Harvard. </p>

<p>But even if you do want to be an engineer, I think you might still choose Harvard (or maybe Princeton). Again, like I said, while Berkeey is clearly a better engineering school than either of the other 2, the market doesn't really seem to reward you for that fact. So I think you have to be quite sure that you really like engineering for its own sake in order to choose Berkeley.</p>

<p>SJSU civil and mechanical on average has a higher salary than Berkeley civil and mechanical engineers? is this because jobs in silicon valley are higher paying, and more sjsu engineers end up working in SV compared to berkeley engineers? yet, why is industrial and systems engineering students at sjsu earn less? is ISE much different from IEOR?</p>

<p>Unlimitedx, I think you misread the data:</p>

<p>Average starting salaries for Berkeley:
CivE - 57153
ME - 57522</p>

<p>Average starting salaries for SJSU
CivE - 56744
ME-55233</p>

<p>As far as why Berkeley IEOR students are making significantly more than ISE students at SJSU, I would posit that one major reason is that a lot of Berkeley IEOR students don't really become engineers, but instead become management consultants or investment bankers, whereas I would think very very few SJSU students do that. This notion is further reinforced by the career titles chosen by a lot of Berkeley IEOR students as shown below.</p>

<p><a href="http://career.berkeley.edu/Major/IEOR.stm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://career.berkeley.edu/Major/IEOR.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>But that further reinforces what I said before - that a lot of engineering students from Berkeley (and other top schools) will not actually take jobs as engineers, instead preferring to run off to consulting or banking. Which, again, reduces the importance of choosing a 'strong' engineering school. If you're not going to take an engineering job anyway, frankly, who cares how strong your engineering program is? It then only matters if you can't get one of those other jobs and thus have to fall back on your engineering degree as a 'safety career'. Granted, there is value in that 'insurance policy', but each person has to be the one to decide just how valuable that really is.</p>