<p>Yes I have done circuits more in depth in my computer engineering courses s-domain though, my calculus based physics course only covered basics of newtons laws, forces, keplars laws, electromagnetism, optics, momentum etc… we used work = 2pi*f and integrations. </p>
<p>I don’t think it will be as boring as easy. Physics is always difficult at any level but going backwards and doing the same stuff without calculus should be straight forward. People from my school mentioned algebra-based is a ton easier and this is coming from kids who dropped calc-based and took algebra based later on. </p>
<p>I agree with the waster of brain power though. The linear algebra book is maybe 80 pages long and $20 but man the stuff in there is ridiculous. You have to know the greek alphabet to read it. Our school used the matrix approach for linear algebra and homework is 60% of the grade. There is 3 problems per lecture. My roommate who is a math major took it this semester and it is the only math class he didnt get an A in and know wants to be an econ major after that class. </p>
<p>Non-calc based physics seems to be the way to go as far as keeping the gpa safe. I’ll have the B.S. in chemistry this spring minus p-chem and am thinking about taking biochemistry, non-calc physics and maybe 2 random classes. Then maybe take p-chem my senior year. This still leaves a lot of room for classes. So I might do chemical engineering, biochemistry, or double major in chem and bio. </p>
<p>I talk to my advisor when break ends. He was for the double major saying it would make me look like a king since it is so uncommon to do in 4 years. </p>
<p>My grades are posted up top i actually had a B in gen chem but the gpa was still the same 2.98 first semester. Know I have a 3.45 gpa as above. I am curious if I am in a good situation.</p>