<p>jjalfonso1, as in every case in statistical data, neither the raw numbers nor the per-capita numbers tell the whole story. Both are necessary to get a full picture. For example, Princeton doesn’t raise the most in raw numbers; but it does have a very high per-capita giving, hence why it has the highest giving rate among top universities (over 60%), suggesting a fiercely loyal alumni base. But, even though USC doesn’t do as well on the per-capita measure, it does much better than Princeton on raw numbers. Both are useful measures. (I have a feeling that if USC ranked even higher in per-capita donations than it does already, you wouldn’t be contesting this figure. ;))</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The only declines in Stanford’s giving were from 2008-2010, during the recession. Throughout this time, all universities raised less (20+%) than before. USC dropped from $409m to $369m. In the most recent year-to-year change (2010-2011), USC raised $426m, then dropped to $402m in 2011, a decline of 6%. Meanwhile, Stanford increased from $599m to $709m, an 18% increase. And throughout the past 5 years (the duration of Stanford’s latest campaign), USC has raised $469m down to $402m, a decline of 14%. So how has USC had a “significant rise”?</p>
<p>FWIW, during this recession (2008-2011), USC raised an average of $402m, and Stanford raised an average of $683m (1.7x). Stanford finished its $4.3b campaign 2 years ahead of schedule, during the worst of the recession, and finished its 5-year campaign with $6.23b. This is larger than USC’s $6b campaign, planned after the recession and spread over 7 years.</p>
<p>docfreedaddy, it’d be great for everyone in the USC forum if you could support your position with facts and numbers. So please, explain to me and others what you mean by “significant rise.”</p>
<p>SeattleTW,</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m curious how you drew this conclusion. As far as the numbers show, Johns Hopkins, Cornell, Columbia, and Yale also have the “will and tenacity” to compete with H and S (in fact, more so than USC), and even then, not one of them has been able to compete with H/S. Indeed, both JHU and Columbia have raised more on average, indicating a greater “will and tenacity” to compete with H/S, and on a per-capita basis, Yale joins the fray. Please explain what you mean by USC being the ‘only college in America’ that has this characteristic.</p>