So you are comparing the choice not to attend a concert to the issues involved in transferring to a new school in the middle of the year? You are again ignoring the millions of families who do not have access to high speed internet access required for an online school.
I am not only talking about having the money to pay $1,000 a year for that access, I’m talking about that fact that many poor areas, and even many mid income areas, do not have access to high speed internet at all.
In the rural South it is the worst, with almost 1/3 of the families with school age students not having access to high speed internet.
Then, of course, you are ignoring the fact that poor children often have absolutely zero space at home. They don’t have any quiet private spaces to themselves.
The entire suggestion therefore assumes that every kid has:
A. Access to high speed internet
B. Income that allows high speed internet
C. Income for electronics with a screen and sound that are good enough for decent learning, and
D. a room in the home which is free for 6-8 hours a day.
Hundreds of thousands of kids do not have these.
And you are comparing the choice not to attend a concert to quitting work in the middle of the year, going on unemployment at best, not having work at worst?
Reality check: many teachers cannot simply “Choose find other work”. Their choices are: “work or starve”.
I’m sorry, but these two choices are choices that ONLY the very wealthy people have. The idea that underpaid teachers can simply walk out of their jobs without starving, or that parents can have their kids attend an online school without internet issues ignores the basic fact that millions do not have that sort of money.
Why do so many people here on CC seem to be entirely unaware of the conditions in which more than half of the people in the USA actually live? Sheesh.