<p>
To be honest, they shouldn’t be paying for my service (and can get it for free once a week as an IRS sponsored tax clinic at our library, though I can’t tell them that once they walk in the door). They pay our fees out of their refund, and don’t trust the free services - at some of them “you get what you pay for.”</p>
<p>These are the same clients, who couldn’t be talked out of taking refund anticipation loans, rather than waiting 2 weeks for their refund, like everybody else. Many don’t have bank accounts, and pay 2-3% every time they cash a paycheck at the local pawn shop, unless they’re lucky enough to live near their employer’s bank, who might cash it for free (even Walmart charges $3 er check. I have changed the lives of a small number of clients, who are coachable, but so many don’t understand money, and have no desire to understand. These are the ones whose kids end up at the for-profit schools who will accept anyone who can qualify for federal loans. </p>
<p>So while I dislike cutting off all low-income students from loans, I think something needs to be done to discourage the abuse (by the colleges, not the students). As much as they are victims of circumstance, I believe anyone who signs a loan should be responsible to pay it off. If that means the only low-income students going to college are the ones who qualify for grants instead of loans, perhaps it will encourage low income families to help their students do so. It seems that same should apply for middle class students as well. I’m against loan forgiveness, except as an incentive to take the jobs nobody else seems to want - teaching in the inner city schools, for instance. </p>
<p>We know what we can afford, and have told our children we will not cosign any loans - those belong to them. We have also told them how much we can pay toward their education, and they should be afford something food - including HYPS if they get in (at least according to their net price calculators).</p>
<p>I find it offensive that families with similar income to ours, who have chosen not to save, or to forego certain lusuries, would expect not to be held accountable for their loans. I don’t think the current FAFSA formulas are particularly fair, but they are what they are. If those families have to take out loans, because they can’t come up with the money any other way, I don’t think the rest of us should end up paying them off for them.</p>
<p>Perhaps we need a new type of insurance policy, similar to mortgage insurance. (Actually it already exists for certain private loans). Pay your premium, and if you can’t make your loan payments, the insurance kicks in and pays it for you. Of course it would drive the cost of those loan/insurance combo even higher, but maybe it would get some small portion of families to reconsider.</p>