There’s always an exception - and three elite schools were mentioned vs. more than a thousand others.
No one is saying that students from an LAC cannot be successful. People are saying that their initial outcomes (which then manifest through their future) are more unpredictable, likely less assured, and will likely pale in comparison over time.
For what it’s worth, Bryan Moynihan got into B of A because he worked for a bank (first in legal, then in banking) they bought. And before he worked for the bank, got a JD at Notre Dame.
Jamie Dimon has a Harvard MBA.
I think the point is really being missed - or perhaps I missed it and I’m not sure how we got here from title of the thread.
In today’s world, a Liberal Arts degree may be of value but it certainly does not have the initial outcomes of a pre-professional degree. And typically those who start highest stay higher through life. No one said that you can’t turn a liberal arts degree or any degree into an MBA (as Dimon did) or JD (as Moynihan did).
I have no doubt that if my liberal arts kid had any ability/comprehension of accounting or CS or engineering principles, she’d choose a different route. And she would pursue her passion on the side. But that is not her aptitude and as I’m similar to her (my engineer son takes after my better half), I get it and support it.
She is able to choose the route she has - and she and my wife are able to work with refugees for the last few years at cost to the family because I have been able to set up the family financially to do so. And I’ve created this - not with my History undergrad although admittedly I made six figures at 23 years old being in sales - but because my MBA helped me to build a career.
My daughter lives in the best apartment (because dad wants her next to campus vs. a 20 minute walk away like others). My daughter is able to be in a sorority, buy a dress for a formal which seems like 2x a year, and start a club at school to help refugees (also costing me money) - because dad is able to suppor that.
But I am the exception. When we put up Harvard, Tufts, Hamilton, etc. - that’s the exception - how about the LACs ranked below 40 (or regular colleges too) and the majority of kids that are out there with liberal arts majors (perhaps excluding Econ).
There is a reason majors such as these make rankings as the worst - and yes, they are looking at $$ because not everyone has dad or a husband/wife/boyfriend/girlfriend/sugar daddy/sugar mama to support them through. It doesn’t mean these are bad - but you find these common across many rankings - so perhaps where there’s smoke, there’s fire. I know my daughter’s studies are right for her today - but whether they are right for her tomorrow, that’s the unknown. Because I have the ability to be a financial safety net for her, I’m supportive in her pursuing her goals, just as my dad supported (even at great financial waste) my desire to be a sportscaster. Everyone has different values.
But in this day and age, it’s different world than 40 years ago - and it’s interesting to me and I just pulled up 4 random self proclaimed LACs and:
- Grinnell - CS is the top major
- W&L - Business and accounting are the top 2
3.Harvey Mudd - Engineering - Carleton - Computer Science
There’s a reason they’ve “expanded”.
Some of the commonly mentioned worst majors across multiple polls:
Anthropology
Consumer Science
Early Childhood Education
English/Literature
Fine Arts
History
Hospitality
Religion
Psychology
Sociology
Theater
I’m sure we’ve killed this 18 times over - we all think differently and that’s fine.