<p>Harvard and MIT don’t belong on this list, imo.</p>
<p>Harvard won’t accept you and MIT doesn’t seem to be a good fit. However, I wouldn’t drop Harvard because you never know, your URM status is a great advantage, and if you really want to apply, just go for it. You won’t be the first.</p>
<p>But I <em>would</em> reconsider MIT. Why do you want to go there? If you really want to have a techy school on your list–and your great scores and accomplishments in literature- and language-related subjects make me wonder why you’d insist on MIT (not that MIT doesn’t provide a good education in the humanities, but, you know)–maybe Harvey Mudd would be a better (and shrewder) choice? And it’s more likely to accept you. You don’t have the ECs for MIT.</p>
<p>As for UChicago, it’s a reach for everyone and I don’t know if your SAT score will impress its adcom, BUT, again, your ethnicity might help you. Make sure you write amazing essays because that’s what UChicago is about.</p>
<p>I’m not trying to rain on your parade, but a 3.4 GPA is just too low for the likes of Harvard. I’m not saying it’s impossible–after all, if you look at the best universities’ Common Data Sets, some people <em>do</em> get in with comparable grades (and it’s CC’s collective opinion that it’s only hooked applicants like you who can hope to be accepted with a low GPA)–but your GPA is more likely to kill your application than your URM status and test scores are to save it.</p>
<p>btw, I’m applying to UChicago with an even lower GPA and slightly lower SAT, so I know what I’m talking about. Expect the worst, hope for the best. (Though you have a bigger chance than me, so that’s something at least.)</p>
<p>Oh, and add some schools that are better than Oklahoma State/OU, but less selective than UChicago. There’s a big gap in your list that needs to be filled.</p>
<p>Maybe look into some LACs? Some of them might be more willing to take in a talented underachiever than the big universities. Vassar, Reed, I don’t know, Carleton? Wesleyan?</p>