<p>Here is the issue: if you get accepted to those schools that guarantee to meet full financial need, then they will provide it to you. WIth a family income of about $22K and not much in assets, you would get most of the need met by those colleges. </p>
<p>For most of the colleges in the US, the ones not on that list that are need blind, yes,it will make a difference whether you can pay or not as to whether or not you get accepted. For some, if you get accepted, there still is no guarantee that you will get your financial aid met.</p>
<p>For example, NYU is a very selective univesity. It is need blind (don’t know about internationals–you have to look that up) for US students. But if you are accepted, it doesn’t guarantee to meet your need. It’s your business and problem to come up with the money,</p>
<p>Washington in St Louis is also a very fine school, They are not need blind (again all info I am giving here has to be double checked) for anyone, including US students. So, it would make a difference in getting in , if you say you are not applying for financial aid. That is taken into consideration in viewing your application, and those who can pay, get some preference. Not 100% of the time, but for some times. The schools do not give details on how they use their need aware policies. But if you can pay the full price, you are at an advantage for getting accepted. </p>
<p>However, if you get accepted even though you do have financial need, and that school , like many in that category, do accept a lot of needy applicants, they will meet your need. </p>
<p>A school like Harvard will not care if you have need, and will accept you and meet your need. </p>
<p>So you have those categories:</p>
<p>1) Don’t care if you have need, and will meet full need if accepted
2) Care if you have need, but will meet full need if accepted
3) Don’t care if you have need, but no guarantee to meet need if accepted, but might do so, if you are a top catch for them</p>