<p>There’s a paper ranking universities based on “revealed choice,” ie. at what universities cross-admits actually matriculate. It also breaks down rankings by regions of the school’s origin. </p>
<p>Avery et al. “A Revealed Preference Ranking of US Colleges & Universities”
[SSRN-A</a> Revealed Preference Ranking of U.S. Colleges and Universities by Christopher Avery, Mark Glickman, Caroline Hoxby, Andrew Metrick](<a href=“http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=601105]SSRN-A”>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=601105)
See Page 46, “Region 9: CA, HI, OR, WA”</p>
<p>On the west coast, Cornell is the 14th most-preferred, and Berkeley is 25th. </p>
<p>Some caveats. </p>
<p>(i) Using this method, public universities (ie. Berkeley) may be expected to have a big advantage in their own region, since tuition will be much cheaper, prompting students to vote with their pockets. Results then might not be characteristic of “reputation,” but both “reputation” and “cost” (not to mention other factors, like weather, college experience, etc). </p>
<p>(ii) You asked what Cornell’s reputation is in California (presumably among the average person), and this simply indicates that cross-admits from the West Coast usually attend Cornell; cross-admits at Berkeley and Cornell are probably not similar to the “average Californian,” but their choices also might be influenced by what their belief of their respective prestige. </p>
<p>(iii) This ranking includes Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington, although restricting it to CA probably wouldn’t change the finding much (perhaps not at all). </p>
<p>Both Cornell and Berkeley provide outstanding opportunities; your education will undoubtedly be what you make of those opportunities, and succeeding at either one will being meaningful to employers and colleagues.</p>