<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I am a high school senior in Washington state and I'm currently debating between UW and UCLA.</p>
<p>I am planning to go to med school, so I was wondering what you think is the best choice?</p>
<p>Arguments for UW:</p>
<p>Get to stay close to home. Lots of my friends are going to UW as well. In-state tuition is about 4 times less than out-of-state tuition for CA.</p>
<p>I also did a program in high school that allowed me to earn college credit for UW, so I could enter as a junior essentially. This would be nice because since I am going to med school and planning to do residency, I can shave 2 years from undergrad, but do med schools see this as a negative?</p>
<p>Arguments for UCLA:</p>
<p>I personally think California is a ton of fun. The campus is located in one of the most happening cities in the world. There will always be something to do. I'll get to get away from home where I can become independent and grow on my own. I already am accepted into their Biochemistry department, but will plan to transfer to Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, which is more suited for students who plan on going to med school.</p>
<p>Biggest downsides are out-of-state tuition but that isn't much of a problem, and I have to do 4 years of undergrad as opposed to 2 years at UW, but I'm sure once I get to college I won't want to leave.</p>
<p>My dad thinks I should stay home at UW because if I do medicine, I can go to UW for undergrad and have a better shot at UW med school, is this true? But then again, if I got to UCLA, I can have a better shot at UCSF's med school, or any of the other strong ones in CA.</p>
<p>Also, do top med schools on the east coast care about which undergrad I go to, or do they just care about GPA and MCAT?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>