Which do you prefer, fame or fortune?

<p>I don’t want to be famous at all. And I don’t care about power, for the posts that brought it up. But I would love to be rich. I have very expensive tastes :(.</p>

<p>If we’re assuming that fame doesn’t bring fortune, than I wish for fortune. </p>

<p>Money can’t buy you everything, but who cares about those things anyway.</p>

<p>lol I’d rather have fame. I can live without stuff, but it would be really awesome for people to know who I am after I’m gone</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>He’s probably already rich. When was the last time a poor man became president?</p>

<p>I’d like a small fortune…then I could make a big fortune and be famous.</p>

<p>Fortune, by far.</p>

<p>I’d hate to be recognized by random people, even if it’s for a good thing. I’d rather have private matters stay private. </p>

<p>(This is assuming fame does not mean as much of a fortune, good looks, etc.)</p>

<p>Fame because I want everyone to remember my name. lol.</p>

<p>Fortune all the way!</p>

<p>I would without a doubt pick fortune over fame. I much prefer to live veeeery comfortably with little attention, rather than my face being plastered all over the world. Fame nearly ensures fortune, but I desire privacy. So show me the money :smiley: lol</p>

<p>Well, if you have fortune, you can donate some of it to a building or program, put your name on it, and you’ve got fame. Look at Andrew Carnegie. :p</p>

<p>^Haha, so true ;)</p>

<p>Fortune. I’d dislike all the attention that comes with Fame.</p>

<p>^ Same here. I’d rather go with fortune. I want to travel the world!</p>

<p>Fortune can buy fame. I’d go with fortune.</p>

<p>

Walton is the new Rockefeller, only less presumptuous-sounding.</p>