<p>It surely isn't all I'll base my decision off of, but considering that social life is going to be a big part of my next four years, it's definitely going to weigh in. This thread is not attempting to convince anyone to go to ASU over Harvard, but rather chart the physical appearance of students at the nations top schools. If you are accepted to two high caliber institutions, I see no reason why "prettiness" couldn't be even a deciding factor. Anyhow, enough with defending the purpose of this thread-- let's have some more opinions to help out any other socially-conscious high school seniors.</p>
<p>AhaHAhahAHah..</p>
<p>"physical appearance of students at the nations top schools..."</p>
<p>i don't know why.. it was juss funny//</p>
<p>Pshh... silly dissenters. Haha</p>
<p>
[quote]
...but considering that social life is going to be a big part of my next four years, it's definitely going to weigh in.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>What does the quality of a social life at a particular environment have to do with how good people look in general? If this was about dating, then I would understand. But we are talking about a social life here correct? I think I am missing something here.</p>
<p>I do have to say that everyone is georgeous at bucknell--only a handfull of less than attractive people, AND a georgeous campus hehe 'Ray Bucknell! </p>
<p>And our basketball team rocks major argile socks</p>
<p>not rice. went there, and not exactly the cream of the crop. and i have more than enough first hand accounts from students currently going there.</p>
<p>but i think this subject is kind of stupid anyway. i just mentioned rice b/c i've heard nothing but bad things about it, even from its students.</p>
<p>^^; Uuummm well no. ^_^; It's really a bad habit. Sorry!</p>
<p>um, not MIT. and from what i've experienced at pton, few attractive guys, a few cute girls here and there, but not enough. but very nice people at pton. MIT, not exactly a place to look for a hot date.</p>
<p>The obvious answer is Uppsala university (though it's not in the US)...</p>
<p>im sorry but there usually is a concensus that west is prettier than the new england area.... lol.</p>
<p>most schools out wwest (UCSB, ASU, USD) are much prettier than any student body up north. From the schools Ive seen, new england schools are all below average. UNCCH is alright. FSU has decent decent body as well</p>
<p>Uppsala in Sweden right?</p>
<p>I go to Stanford and I have to say that the population as a whole is very beautiful</p>
<p>NE --- most people are pale white :(
Where is the tan?!?!</p>
<p>Texas Tech, UTA and Baylor University are known to have some of the hottest girls on their campuses. Can't speak for the guys though.</p>
<p>playboy magazine ranked northeastern as having the hottest girls</p>
<p>one of my best friends goes to northeastern...</p>
<p>MIT always gets bashed on these things :(</p>
<p>I'm surprised Berkeley hasn't been bashed yet, and I'd probalby join in if it were.</p>
<p>haha, you can actually go to playboy.com and search for college rankings, and in it they say that no one ever gets the list right. if you really care that much you can look it up, but northeastern wasn't number one.</p>
<p>Playboy magazine= UT Austin!</p>
<p>Makes sense due to the top 10% rule!</p>