- Bachelor in Chemical Engineering (from UT-Austin, MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech, Princeton, if I can get into the latter 5 colleges), MBA (from UT-Austin, or Harvard, Stanford, MIT Sloan, Wharton if I can get into the latter 4 colleges) --> Work in a petroluem-based company doing finance (like budgeting, risk management, etc.). I know this can be lucrative because these jobs are needed, and the fact that the company would be petroluem-based gives a bit of a boost in salary as well.
- Bachelor, and then Masters in Finance/Quantitative Analysis from Wharton (applying ED) --> Work on Wall Street as a quant trader. I know this can be a stressful, but lucrative job.
The reason I’m in a dilemma is because I don’t know whether or not I want to apply Wharton ED next year. I know if I do apply, that first career path is out of question (Engineering at Penn isn’t that great at all), since the decision in binding. But I know Wharton produces many smart, business-ready people with opportunities at Goldman-Sachs and other companies. However, WITHOUT ED, I can apply to other top-tier schools for either ChemE or business (since without a binding decision, I can choose my major later on), and then get an MBA later on.
If someone can tell me which career path would have the best job prospect (assuming I get into UT-Austin for path #1, and Wharton ED for path #2), it would definitely help with my decision on whether or not to do ED at UPenn Wharton.