<p>I am deciding between UCSD and UCLA (also made Berkeley). I am an undecided major but I believe that for whatever I major in, even if the quality of education is different, the material I learn will be the same so I want to base my choice on other factors.</p>
<p>UCSD seems to have a better environment, I’d be at Muir which is like the perfect location there and more of my highschool friends were accepted there (I’ll already know people and I’m more of a eccentric introvert). </p>
<p>UCLA has a better food system (one swipe, all you can eat, I love eating in quantity), I could watch the basketball there (known for having players like Westbrook, Love) and my parents want me to go there (my dad used to work at UCLA hospital I would supposedly have more opportunities for research and such)</p>
<p>My parents believe Berkeley and LA have better overall “academic reputations”, which from what I’ve read/heard is somewhat true, but I don’t see how UCSD can be that much behind as I believe an education is an education eg. if I learn physics at one school it’ll be the same physics somewhere else. Does one school really have a better “quality of education” and how so? Where does Berkeley/LA’s reputations (as “better” schools) come from (skewed by athletic excellence maybe, but then again my parents don’t follow college sports)?</p>