<p>Neither of the above two sections was experimental</p>
<p>math experimental had a question about making cubes and a question about different combinations of colors one could have for a computer screen</p>
<p>anyone know which writing section was experimental section 4 or 6?</p>
<p>The writing with the improving paragraph on hybrid cars was NOT experimental</p>
<p>I had too many CR/WS sections for my test. Pretty sure my experimental section was one of those two. I think it was the troubadour one? Maybe…</p>
<p>As for the scatterplot graph, NO IDEA whatsoever what they wanted so I just left it blank lol.</p>
<p>for the scatterplot I think it was just to find a dot that fits in a particular x,y unit and use it to find the answer, it was something like that…didn’t take calculating, just connecting the dots basically. (or I might be thinking of another problem that I was solving which wasn’t on the test but my wires in my head are all jumbled lol)</p>
<p>^^ Haha I second the bit on the wires in my head being all jumbled up!</p>
<p>okay thank you SouthKP… wow i could have sworn i had 4 math sections so one of them had to be an experimental but i guess not because i don’t remember those questions. well does anyone know which CR was the experimental then?</p>
<p>My SAT had a total of 10 sections. As far as I can remember, the first 4 sections were like this: Essay, Critical Reading, Mathematics, Mathematics (both Math were grid-in).</p>
<p>Did I have an experimental section?</p>
<p>Hey sqdwfe13 that’s the same format i had but yeah i don’t remember after section 4 the order. Do you know if you had 4 sections of math? i know if you had two long writing sections then the hybrid car one was the real one. Don’t know if that helps you or not.</p>
<p>I think I must have had 4 sections of math. I had the hybrid car thing, so I know my writing wasn’t experimental. And then I had the Nikhil passage so my CR wasn’t experimental either. </p>
<p>So, if math is my worst section, is getting an experimental math a good thing? :/</p>
<p>Hmm, I’m getting pretty concerned because I had a CR experimental section, but it is one that no one has mentioned, and none of my friends had it either…
It had to do with a woman writing her mother’s memoirs? The mother was a Russian political activist? One of the questions had to do with the tone of the mother? The answer was ‘histrionic’ (or at least that is what I put)? Did anyone have that CR passage? Have they ever had multiple CR experimental sections…It is just so weird that no one has had it or discussed it</p>
<p>well math is not mine best section so i was hoping that the first math section i had was an experimental since i left some blank/didn’t get to answer the last three. i think it would be a good thing unless you did better on the experimental than on the section that counts. sqdwfe13 did you have a math section with making cubes and computer color combos?</p>
<p>also just wondering can there be like two different math experimental sections?</p>
<p>@HelloKitty55</p>
<p>Nope, I didn’t have those, but I also don’t have a very good memory so I don’t know, maybe I did… Do you remember the questions more precisely, like the details and such?</p>
<p>It’s just kind of weird, all of my sections were supposedly non-experimental. Is it possible to not have ANY experimental sections?</p>
<p>Well i didn’t have those math questions on my test but supposedly those were the questions from the math experimental. Since im like 95 percent sure i had 4 math sections without those questions(cube and computer combo), i had only one long writing section, and i didn’t have the Russian lady critical reading part, maybe i didn’t have an experimental section either? but i don’t think that possible or fair!!</p>
<p>Oh okay. I think we had the same exact version, then. Hopefully one of our math sections was experimental because I screwed up pretty badly on some of the grid-in questions.</p>
<p>look at CB’s website for the expiermentals</p>
<p>If you took the blue cover version of the SAT on Saturday, October 10, 2009, you had one of two section orders. Your test was organized like this:</p>
<ol>
<li>Essay</li>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Equating (the one that doesn’t count toward your score)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading (includes 2 long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading
<ol>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol></li>
</ol>
<p>OR, like this:</p>
<ol>
<li>Essay</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Equating (the one that doesn’t count toward your score)</li>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading (includes 2 long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Mathematics
<ol>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol></li>
</ol>
<p>If you took the pink-cover version of the SAT on Saturday, October 10, 2009, you had one of two section orders. Your test was organized like this:</p>
<ol>
<li>Essay</li>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading (includes 2 long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol>
<p>OR, like this:</p>
<ol>
<li>Essay</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Mathematics (includes SPR questions)</li>
<li>Writing</li>
<li>Reading (includes 2 long passages)</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Reading</li>
<li>Mathematics</li>
<li>Writing</li>
</ol>
<p>how do u know this dj? it seems pretty accurate. and the experimental could be anythin right for section 4? cuse i think i had writing and my friend said she had reading</p>