<p>I love how people assume that one school is just not as good as another universities without offering one iota of evidence because it's "Plain and simple?" Really?. I don't recall common sense ever offers quantitative data or qualifications to judge the education quality of of one institution over another. But instead of using street logic to debate, let's look at some hard numbers that prospective students care about to see in what way are these schools so "great."</p>
<p>Financial Aids:* (collegeboard.com)</p>
<p>Percentage of those applied for aids and got aids:
1) Cornell: 93.1% (1407 applied, 1310 received)
2) BC: 83% (1124 applied, 939 received)
3) Carnegie Mellon: 66.5% (1416 app, 942 rec)
4) JHU: 64.9% (1206 app, 783 rec)
5) Tufts: 54.1% (1400 app, 758 rec)</p>
<p>Percentage of Grants/loans
1) Tufts: 82%/18
2) JHU: 75%/25
3) Carnegie Mellon: 73%/27
4) BC: 71%/29
4) Cornell: 71%/29</p>
<p>**Student body<a href="Collegeboard.com">/b</a>
Student returning for sophomore year:
1) JHU:97%
2) BC: 96%
2) Tufts: 96%
2) Cornell: 96%
3) Carnegie Mellon: 95%</p>
<p>Percentage of incoming student in top 10th of graduating class:
1) Cornell: 87%
2) JHU: 82%
3) BC: 80%
3) Tufts: 80%
4) Carnegie Mellon: 73%</p>
<p>C/O 2012's SAT Range (25th Cr/M/W)-(75th Cr/M/W) (From each individual school's website)
Tufts: (690/690/690) - (760/770/770)
JHU: (660/690/670) - (760/780/760)
BC: 1950-2200 (No break down available)
Cornell: (630/660/-) - (770/730/-)</p>
<p>C/O 2012 ACT Range (25th)-(75th) (Schools' websites)
JHU: 30-34
BC: 30-33
Tufts: 31 Average
Cornell: 28-30**</p>
<p>*Prestigious Fellowships *</p>
<p>Rhodes Scholars in the past five years:
1) BC: 2
2) Cornell: 1
2) JHU: 1
3): Carnegie Mellon: 0 (last winner in 2002)
3) Tufts: 0 (None in this millennium, last winner in 1998)</p>
<p>Marshall Scholars in the past 5 years:
1) BC: 3 (2008, 2008, 2004)
1) Cornell: 3 (2008, 2007, 2005)
1) JHU: 3 (2007, 2004, 2004)
2) Carnegie Mellon: 1 (first one ever in 2008)
3) Tufts: 0</p>
<p>Fulbright Winners from 2004 to 2006 (only data available):
1) BC: 35
US.FULBRIGHTONLINE.ORG</a> || Program Resources - U.S. Institutions - Boston College, Undergraduate
2) Cornell: 32
US.FULBRIGHTONLINE.ORG</a> || Program Resources - U.S. Institutions - Cornell University
3) Tufts: 29
US.FULBRIGHTONLINE.ORG</a> || Program Resources - U.S. Institutions - Tufts University
4) John Hopkins: 25
US.FULBRIGHTONLINE.ORG</a> || Program Resources - U.S. Institutions - Johns Hopkins University
5) Carnegie Mellon: 6
US.FULBRIGHTONLINE.ORG</a> || Program Resources - U.S. Institutions - Carnegie Mellon University</p>
<p>Please, can anyone objectively tell me where does BC fall short except for the SAT numbers (a poor indicator of students' future success according to 90% of the experts out there)? It offers comparable financial aids, it attracts comparable students, and its students win MORE prestigious fellowships in recent memory than the other "great" schools. Would someone who is terribly informed please tell me?</p>
<p><em>C/0 2011 data. Some 2012 data are available at some schools and not other so parallel comparisons are not possible. It should be noted some schools experience an increase in terms of SAT and top 10th percentile in their 2012 class.
*</em>C/O 2011. No 2012 available.</p>