Firstly, my son does like it there, so this is just commentary about how my dollar is spent.
Addressing the points above:
| What promises are they breaking to their upperclassmen?
They are not guaranteeing housing to upperclassmen. They are changing the rules on housing; now they force students to move three times to stay on campus. When my kid picked his room for sophomore year, part of the reason was that he and his friends could keep the new set up. Instead, they are making certain buildings all freshmen, others all sophomores, etc.
Don’t know how they will deal with athletes who used to dorm on campus together regardless of class year.
| The fact is that ALL schools raise their tuition every year. “More than their yield can handle”? What does that even mean? If their yield goes up, so be it, if their yield goes down so be it, what does your statement even mean? What promises are they breaking to their upperclassmen? Can you quote or better yet, cite which promise you mean?
All schools do. 4% is quite high: 3.6% is the average for the top private universities.
http://college.usatoday.com/2017/06/09/private-college-tuition-is-rising-faster-than-inflation-again/
(compare overall to the last 10 years of increase - better yet, compare the cost of college textbooks (bought not at the college bookstores but on the competitive market) over the past 30 years, and let me know if tuition tracked the same)
| yes, the president gets paid through some of the tuition money, what are you even trying to say, can you please be clear and point to something or other but not linger in aimless obfuscation?
Ask TIME magazine:
http://time.com/money/4001985/highest-paid-private-college-president/
Clear and to the point, she makes tons of dough with dubious benefit to students. You want a concrete example?
https://poly.rpi.edu/2016/03/02/carnegie_demotes__rpi_classification__from_highest_rating/
| You are one of the few that I heard didn’t get more than the NPC. So far everyone that I’ve spoken to about cost of attendance has said they got more than the NPC predicted from RPI. I would have expected 50% / 50% but no, all people except you has said they got less than the npc.
I understand that ED affects it. I do know others who got less than the NPC, but I’m sure you don’t know them. NPC gives a ball park, but it is useless in certain circumstances. Going from 90% to 50% owner of one’s house is completely fine; I would guess this is not limited to RPI especially regarding how ED students are treated in terms of financial aid.
FWIW, the other college my son wasn’t accepted to values GPA much more than test scores.
I can say that the scholarship criteria, at least for my son, was not based on GPA and that can help first-generation and other at-risk students.
| If he got accepted to RPI with an incoming class average SAT of 1399, you must understand that you will get less merit aid if you fall lower than average, and more aid if you fall higher than average.
His SAT was not the issue. And, holding back on the caps here, we used the NPC, which had us put in his exact SAT score and our exact financial information. There was no obfuscation of what he was or what we had - just a 10K off NPC estimate.
If they counted GPA, which was one area he was below average in, they should have put it in the NPC.
I appreciate that you have some sort of unnaturally close relationship with RPI, but maybe talk to a few current students there. And I appreciate your need to address my post twice. I am paying RPI to educate my son, and plan to in the future. But that doesn’t mean that I can like it or ignore the facts.
(I do want to mention that people on CC who were accepted to RPI have posted who had lower GPA and lower SAT scores than he did, and they noted quite a bit higher aid. I feel that if the NPC took all of our financial info, including what we owed on our house, the estimate should have been better. I am union and have had pay freezes for several years, which gives us back pay in years like the basis year for my son’s college, so union people like me are at a disadvantage compared to those in industry who have set salaries and increases year to year.)