<p>For the 3rd FRQ argumentative essay, I discussed how I implied quite clearly that questioning one's own religious and political beliefs is vital to progress. I also said how, if I wrote a fairy tale book today, and a futuristic race of humans found that book 2,000 years from now and took it as fact, they might take unquestioningly accept it as a truth when in reality it is a fabrication. </p>
<p>I also mentioned politics and decry dogmatism/ unbending certainty on both sides, whether it be in the form of the Far Left, who often believe all conservatives are ignorant and hateful, and the Far Right, who often believe that all liberals are free-loading hippies.</p>
<ul>
<li>I implied quite clearly. Sorry, was typing fast with no contacts in.</li>
</ul>
<p>While I, and perhaps the reader, may disagree with your interpretation of 2,000 year old books as fairy tales, I can’t imagine that you could be penalized for it! Besides, if you had enough time to discuss all of that, I would think that the reader would just automatically stamp a 9 and move on! I couldn’t fit nearly as much in and put my pen down with 10 seconds to go! So kudos!</p>
<p>You will be fine. Shooting for the more radical essays generally helps with scores I’ve heard. They stand out from the generic “well both sides are right so the truth must be in the middle.” Taking a strong and aggressive stance makes it sounds like you know what you are saying.</p>
<p>Oh…On the third i was considering diving into the topic of religion (the certainty quote made it quite a viable option) but i knew my views would not be…favorable to them, so i didn’t, although i did talk about the WBC in my intro</p>