<p>You are not alone in your dilemma. I've been reading CC for about half a year now, and I see repeatedly that parents in Asia have heard of the Ivy universities, MIT and the Universities of California. They are less aware of the other top quality American universities that we admire (such as UChicago). And certainly unknown are our elite Liberal Arts Colleges (such as Amherst, Williams, Swarthmore).</p>
<p>One thought is to see if any Asian students have written about this problem, to decode it for the home-team crowd (their parents, friends and future employers).</p>
<p>Another thought is that spreading around the understanding of "prestige" may not be fixable before next week. Forgive me for being what's termed a "prestige whore" on this site, but as a parent I'd rather pay more for something I'm sure of (for whatever my reasons) than pay less for what discomforts me. I always look at the differential between costs and decide if I am ready to support the differential. I also need to be able to afford what I choose, but I'll make (I think) more material compromises than some to stretch what "afford" means, because
that is my pleasure to educate. </p>
<p>If the prestige issue is that strong in Asia, such that a student will return there and find difficulty being respected or hired when competing with another who went to HYPSC, etc. then the parents might actually feel they're throwing away money to UChicago and feel unhappy for four years, as if they're buying nothing (even though Americans and experienced Asian students will assure you otherwise). </p>
<p>You happen to be asking one of the hardest questions on this site. Is the prestige differential "worth it" when we've got so many other great instiutions of higher education to offer that cost less, or here, cost YOU less.</p>
<p>I feel that if your parents feel it a huge mistake to pay for UChicago and can't get comfortable in time to feel happy about it, then sharpen your pencil and figure out what the loan differential will cost you to pay. There is an important thread here by "taxguy" in which people try to express what costs are folllowing graduation, for rent and so on. I happen to think they are very extreme in saying how much life costs, especially for the frugal such as you and my own kids, who do not insist on solo apartments or car ownership following college (buses still work, thank you). </p>
<p>If you believe a UChicago degree is worthless in your country, I disagree. BUT it is your country. </p>
<p>We're not so democratic here, either. When someone comes to a job interview with a Cornell degree, they are given greater consideration than if they have a degree from American University. I'm sorry but it's true. </p>
<pre><code>IF you determine UChicago, I can tell you that after four years in this country you will fully understand why that was a sound, correct choice but your parents might stay uncomfortable and you might be disadvantaged upon returning to Korea. Your education will be JUST AS GOOD. Both schools are extremely intellectual, urban, sophisticated, international...everything good.
</code></pre>
<p>You are ONLY dealing with the issue of perception of prestige and money.</p>
<p>The Math major, which is all the Chicago will offer you, sounds like it will
equip you to enter grad school in any financial area. Do you want to study Math for four years, versus courses in the subjects you mentioned (financial engineering...). Could you double-major (or major/minor) at UChicago in Math plus Economics, or Math + Government to help balance out your program? If not, do not worry because you'll be taking many other courses in other departments, whether or not you "double-major." So you will learn plenty. </p>
<p>Either way, you are choosing careers that will have excellent payback here if you stay. You are not asking to major in Theater or Psychology. Recently I understand a Korean-American comic said that for anyone to major in Psychology from his extended family would be like "becoming a pole dancer" which is not good at all.</p>