<p>lol just kidding(1110 fyi) </p>
<p>Anyway now that i got your attention i got 2 q's</p>
<p>I just got into Bryant University, do you think that means i have a good chance of getting into University of Vermont. In other words do students who get into Bryant often get into UVM and vice versa?</p>
<p>2nd</p>
<p>The whole thing on Princeton Review about College Counselor(the safety, match, reach thing), how credible or accurate is that?</p>
<p>hahaha that's a great attention getter. I would need to know some more of your stats but I think 1110 is a solid score for u Vermont. </p>
<p>and those counselor-o-matic things dont work. they're very inaccurate. dont trust them</p>
<p>My highs were 580(M) 530(V) and i have a 89 GPA
I had a great first MP this year with a 92.75</p>
<p>also i guess ill mention a few other things
-im 91/235 in my class
-4 years varsity tennis 2 year captain (with mucho success)
2 years of jv football
-ummm i have like a few legacies but their kind of distant like my dads uncle but he gave alot of money and a condo in florida to them and he wrote a letter to the univ for me and they said theyll take that into considerations (for UVM)
-i wanna go for business
-Recs from Marketing teacher of 2 years, math tutor of 6 years
-early action</p>
<p>anything else you think is pertinent ask</p>
<p>If you're playing tennis for UVM (??) and have been in touch with the coach, I'm sure your grades and his recommendation will allow admissions and perhaps some merit aid. Good luck.</p>
<p>Everyone should do that for a topic title. It really got my attention :D.</p>
<p>uvm dropped their team</p>
<p>Haz;
He's pulled the same ruse on other posts.
If everyone did the "same thing", we'd all be wasting loads of time on misinformation and CC would become useless.
Currently, CC is an incredible resource due to the lack of useless posts like "tennis 8.." submits.</p>
<p>Haz;
He's pulled the same ruse on other posts.
If everyone did the "same thing", we'd all be wasting loads of time on misinformation and CC would become useless.
Currently, CC is an incredible resource due to the lack of useless posts like "rskibum" submits.</p>
<p>Misleading thread titles are inappropriate, as they are inaccurate and can waste the time of forum readers.
Posters who use this approach to try to generate traffic for their threads will find their titles changed; repeat offenders will put their posting privileges at risk.
Thank you for your cooperation.</p>
<p>What's wrong with an 1110? Not everyone is a genious like yourself</p>
<p>For your information, an 1110 is over the 50% range. I wouldnt exactly call that bad.</p>
<p>^ Not on the new SATs.</p>
<p>my sats were horrible - 1830 (new)
my ACTs were awesome - 34 composite lol</p>
<p>wow that is a huge difference, how did that happen?</p>
<p>I got a 2180 and a 30, so pretty much the opposite</p>
<p>was too lazy to study for the SATs (June 05')
studied for 3 weeks prior to the ACTs and did far better.(Nov05)
I just proved how inaccurate any type of standardized testing is to measure a Student's knowledge or aplitude. But that's just my opinion.....</p>
<p>Either that or I just woke up from my coma.</p>
<p>mirror<em>of</em>dirt,</p>
<p>Sorry, I need to clarify that. I meant Math + CR</p>
<p>actually an 1110 is still above average on the new SAT :-/</p>
<p>I think you have a very good chance at UVM. I'm curious, what was the original title of the thread now that it's been changed??</p>