<p>As always, this information can be misleading to applicants who can apply only to particular colleges of a multicollege university, not some fictional amalgam of the university as a whole. For example, in the prior admissions cycle, acceptance rates to Cornell’s various undergraduate colleges ranged from 15% to 32%. The university doesn’t have one acceptance rate, it has seven different ones. The same is the case with other multi-college universities where applications are to the component individual colleges, not some conglomeration. Selectivity differences among a university’s various colleges can be quite material in some cases.</p>
<p>Secondly, if one must pointlessly aggregate, then aggregate correctly. Columbia’s information is missing its large undergraduate College of General Studies, which has a much higher acceptance rate than its two other undergraduate colleges. Consequently, Columbia purposely does not report it. This should be included in Columbia’s aggregate admissions %, for whatever that proves, if all colleges are to be included for other universities. It also has an unreported undergraduate nursing program I believe.
From some other recent CC thread, it appears that Johns Hopkins and some others (Georgetown? Duke?) also have unreported colleges deliberately absent from their submitted data. </p>
<p>Meaning you are comparing comprehensive data for some multi-college universities with cherry-picked partial data from some others. And then comparing them all to schools that consist solely of liberal arts colleges. An exercise almost certain to produce some misleading conclusions, IMO.</p>
<p>IMO the wisest thing for you as an applicant to do in assessing your admissions odds most accurately is seek out the data for the particular college of that university that you are actually applying to, not data for the university as aggregate.</p>