<p>@vivalamelanie</p>
<p>I put it was contrary to historical trends since Passage 2 said that people were all moving to cities after world war II while, in contrast, Passage 1 talked about people living on farms nowadays.</p>
<p>Do any of you guys know what the answer was to the question about the henna articles and it was like what is the attitude of person 2 compared to person 1? I put indifferent because I thought pompous was too extreme but not sure :/</p>
<p>it was critical because they were being critical towards celebs with henna.</p>
<p>pompous would be more stuck up and indifferent would have been like straight facts with no opinion</p>
<p>I put it was contrary to historical trends since Passage 2 said that people were all moving to cities after world war II while, in contrast, Passage 1 talked about people living on farms nowadays.
^</p>
<p>which question was this?</p>
<p>I put critical for that one because I felt like the author of Passage 2 was saying that Hollywood detracted from the value of henna as a means of connecting people… But I wasn’t sure about that one</p>
<p>I put satisfied for that question because I thought that the reader sounded pleased with celebrities promoting the henna. Passage 1 sounded more appreciative and celebratory.</p>
<p>I didn’t really see anything about critical or pompous…too extreme (I think) in these passages.</p>
<p>I thought it was just II and III</p>
<p>The first one celebrated the culture, and the 2nd was critical of culture being taken out of henna usage.</p>
<p>does anybody know the answer to this CR question - (section I)
(regarding the two passages about agriculture)</p>
<p>the author of passage I would find what in lines __ (i forgot) noteworthy? or something like this</p>
<p>the lines were something about cities and people getting food from them or something sorry bad memory</p>
<p>(this was the last question regarding the two agriculture passages)</p>
<p>lol im sorry if you guys have no idea what question im talking about, it’s ok cuz i dont really remember it</p>
<p>No - it was 100 + 50sqrt(3)</p>
<p>was the japanese guy bitter or exasperated?</p>
<p>what was the question regarding submissive/acquiesce and public–/demur?</p>
<p>the author of passage I would find what in lines __ (i forgot) noteworthy? or something like this
^</p>
<p>it was the choice about the magazines and getting stuff from people they know is noteworthy to the author of passage I because it used minimal transportation, which was less fossil fuel.</p>
<p>was the japanese guy bitter or exasperated?</p>
<p>what was the question regarding submissive/acquiesce and public–/demur?
^</p>
<p>exasperated i think.he just seemed frustrated with all his previous translators!</p>
<p>i still think it was submissive/acq but there was a lot of debate. ive just been following along as i do hw</p>
<p>all right, i put exasperated. but idk really, bitter/exasperated are practically synonyms</p>
<p>Do you know what the actual question was? I might have read it wrong, idk</p>
<p>Wasn’t it a triangle with the sides of the triangle 3 and 5?</p>
<p>plus the exclamation mark made me think exasperated</p>
<p>Unfortunately I missed 2 math… ridiculous. how much would that be? 74? Anyway here are the math grid-ins.</p>
<p>6
875
7
1/9
3/8
36
25
1999
4
3</p>
<p>Please correct me if I’m wrong.
…actually no then I’ll be even more torn :|</p>
<p>For #33 or 34 on W, the one about old records, what did you guys get?
(C) long since defunct
(D) be carefully
(E) no error</p>
<p>@johnstucky I put E</p>
<p>do you remember what the final grid question was about?</p>
<p>It was a triangle with sides 5, if my memory is correct…
the triangle is supposed to be divided into a 30-60-90 triangle…so the height is supposed to be 2.5(sqrt 3).</p>