<p>I think the first word was public</p>
<p>public went with demur i mean</p>
<p>@nico
if she wasn’t accustomed to being submissive
then she would talk alot
so she wouldn’t be ‘acquiesce’</p>
<p>ohh ok wait</p>
<p>did it say wasnt though?</p>
<p>i thought it said she was accustomed to being ___ without a wasnt.</p>
<p>i could have read it wrong</p>
<p>^I’m 99.9% sure not was in the sentence</p>
<p>No it was not submissive…aquiesce.</p>
<p>If she were unaccustomed to being submissive, then she WOULD acquiesce with the request to talk, because she would like to talk.</p>
<p>Thanks batman about the public…demur thing. That is wrong because if she were unaccustomed to having a public role, then she WOULD demur with the request, because she wouldn’t like to talk.</p>
<p>The correct answer is almost certainly passive…balk.</p>
<p>ok i read it wrong then haha</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure there wasn’t a ‘was not’ but you guys prob know better than me.</p>
<p>@nicobella There might have been a double negative</p>
<p>When will our scores come back?</p>
<p>yeah possibly! i honestly cant remember the whole test that well.</p>
<p>i probably got like a 203 which is a bummer because 1 or 2 more right questions and i could have had it!</p>
<p>“Also, on the writing section in sentence correction where it mentioned how the lady’s greatest accomplishment was her musical achievement- was it correctable? I was stuck between “it is”(original) and “they are.” I might have over thought it a bit.”</p>
<p>does anyone know the exact answer for this?</p>
<p>what was the exact subject? if it was plural, then it was they are. cant remember haha</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it said she was accustomed to ___ so she did not ___ when given the opportunity to speak… Idk…</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it said she was accustomed to ___ so she did not ___ when given the opportunity to speak… Idk…
^</p>
<p>yeah i think that was the wording actually.</p>
<p>so She was accustomed to being passive, so she did not acquiesce when given the opportunity to speak or something.</p>
<p>I think we get them back in December?</p>
<p>on a side note, is being a NMF or NMSF the only good way to get scholarships?</p>
<p>i didnt really study a lot so im going to study more for the sat/act and im just hoping i can still get scholarships lol</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the
“No sooner(A) than the plane touched(B) down when I heard noises throughout(C)…”
and
the sentence correction #~18 the one about a girl finding and collecting specimens and putting them in a jar. I was stuck between A(captured and placed by her into the jar or something) and B(captured and placed them in jar) sorry don’t remember the exact wording.</p>
<p>Math: On the one about a parallelogram and the coordinates with variables… how could k have been between 3 and 5? If n is greater than 2 and less than 4 (2<n<4) then n could be 3. K was, when you graphed the points, on level with 2n. That means that k must be twice what is n. So if you picked 3, k is 2(3)… So couldn’t k be 6? Someone explain how its between 3 and 5</p>
<p>@hagz.
No sooner … Than</p>
<p>i put Captured and placed in them in the jar
i think it was D</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the
“No sooner(A) than the plane touched(B) down when I heard noises throughout(C)…”
^</p>
<p>no change i think</p>
<p>(captured and placed them in jar)
^</p>
<p>i picked that.</p>
<p>it said like she captured and placed so the her is kinda redundant to me since they already said she placed.</p>
<p>franky2020- </p>
<p>could you explain why you picked no sooner to me please? i was confused with that one</p>
<p>@nicobella shouldn’t it be “no sooner than when” ?
edit: nevermind I just looked up the idiom</p>