<p>“San Diego - all decisions will become available at MyApplication on April 18, 2014 (confirmed via UC Counselors and Advisers Bulletin: March 2014 received on March 11, 2014)”</p>
<p>I may have interpreted it wrong but what she is saying is true if April 18th is the last batch… They could come BY mid-march but they will ALL be done by April 18th. Doesn’t mean all will come on April 18th. My 2 cents. Cheers and good luck everyone!</p>
<p>@UC2014hopeful That’s what I thought too, but for UCSB she wrote “will come out in batches starting March 17 blahblah”. She specifies the colleges that will be releasing in batches. Confusing.</p>
<p>I love how this thread ended up derailed into talking about if Ms. Sun is right or not? If it really does help take your mind away from the dreaded wait til release of decision, let the “discussion” continue. </p>
<p>Mrs. Sun probably provides more useful information than what you have done. If you think she’s wrong, go and make your own college admissions site or something. </p>
<p>Side note, she said UCR will start on March 1, we did see some people getting accepted in February 28 which is the day before. Chill out, it’s just by one day. And I remember UCI starts on March 1, which we did see people reporting that they got accepted. It’s your choice to bieve her or not. If you want to talk smack about her, she’s on college confidential so go mention her or something. </p>
<p>@UC2014HOPEFUL - If you read the wording for UCSD it’s the same as the wording for UCB on her blog,</p>
<p>“Berkeley - all decisions will become available at myBerkeleyApplication on April 25, 2014 (confirmed)”</p>
<p>She should word it more carefully because both ways it sounds as if she is saying that all decisions will come out on the 18th not by the 18th. Does that make sense?</p>
<p>It seems like she got her information (and maybe wording) directly from some kind of bulletin for UC counselors. Maybe UCSD’s MyApplication wasn’t just updated for this year; it could be that the “decision pending” message was just copied+pasted from previous years, while they implement a new system for this year.</p>
<p>She worded it exactly as my counselor did at school so I think she just stated what she was told.
I was given this list by school transfer counselor:</p>
<p>Berkeley
4/25</p>
<p>Davis
4/18</p>
<p>Irvine
4/18</p>
<p>Los Angeles
Late April</p>
<p>Merced
3/18 rolling</p>
<p>Riverside
3/1 rolling</p>
<p>San Diego
4/18</p>
<p>Santa Barbara
3/17 rolling</p>
<p>Santa Cruz
3/17 rolling</p>
<p>UCSD doesn’t list that it willing be rolling basis. But it does say it will start freshmen 3/15 rolling
so idk if they changed it this year or what? </p>
<p>btw UCLA will have a wait list this year for most majors. I think its the first time this happens? </p>
<p>@sonic23 - This is from the UCSD Transfer admissions site</p>
<p>“Application and Admission Timeline: Transfer Students
Key dates in the application process
Expand All
August to October
November 1 - 30
December
January
January 1 - March 2 Mid–March - April 30
Transfer admission decisions are posted.
You can view admission decisions online. You’ll also receive an email reminder to check MyApplication.
The online packet for admitted students will include a financial aid estimate for students who have filed a FAFSA or California Dream Act application, any scholarship awards that have been made and a link to your application for housing.”</p>
<p>@smltk1505h - Is there an official thing somewhere on the UC or UCSD site that says that?</p>
<p>And I doubt they’re just going to hold out until April 18th.</p>
<p>When potential students submitted their application for transfer it’s also somewhat of a contract that the University will uphold it’s end and release them on or before the date that is/was posted.</p>
<p>So at very minimum they would be required to send out some admissions decisions in “Mid-March” </p>
<p>Source: Business Law Professor at CCC just asked today.</p>
<p>They probably make minor updates (like changing the year or whatever) it for the next year admissions sooner or later and after that, they just leave it. </p>
<p>We got an amendment to what they said on the transfer timeline. Whether or not that they will still start on mid-march or release everything at once, we’ll just have to wait and see. All we know is that we’ll get our decisions by April 18, which is better than having to wait until the last day of April or May 1st to find out your decision. </p>
<p>You can cite legalese law stuff and argue about semantics all you want (my guess is that you want to be a lawyer?), but I don’t think they care that a prospective student is unhappy that they may or may not release them all at once a month later after they stated so. They’ve stated mid-march to late April and as far as I know, they’re still holding true to what they’ve said because they certainly aren’t obligated to release decisions on the first day they consider “mid-March”. I’m pretty sure that timeframe is when you can EXPECT them to START releasing decisions. </p>
<p>@Smltk1505h - If they’re holding true to the “Mid-March” then Ms. Sun is incorrect, and should at very least state that they are sending them out starting mid-march and continuing through the later date as she did for UCR.</p>
<p>The timeframe isn’t when to expect them to release decisions, they will be releasing ** Some{/B] decisions in “mid-march” as many we see likely this Saturday.</p>
<p>on the bulletin it clearly says: “” A few UC campuses have started sending out freshman admission decisions on a rolling basis, with other campuses soon to follow. Below is a list of admissions decision release dates, by campus, for both freshmen and transfers. Please note that these dates may be subject to change""""<br>
I think they are going to release the first batch around march 16th and like last years theres gonna be a huge gap between first batch and the second one. </p>
<p>Ms. Sun is probably paraphrasing what the campuses said in the newsletter. I don’t think she is being intentionally vague. If she had more information then I’m sure she would have added it. Blame the UCs, not her. </p>