<p>Reverence (to the one about the guy he admired as a teenager)
A sudden change from the woman to the man (also same passage. It was when he started talking about the man)
Exhilaration (It can't be frustration because it never explained HOW he actually felt when he found out others had done it. It cant be curiosity because it is weaker than exhilaration. He seemed full of energy. he wanted to climb the grand canyon, be first on the moon. He felt as if he knew it alL!)</p>
<p>I think it's a close call between curiosity and frustration. I was caught between those 2 choices and I chose the former.</p>
<p>I had reverence and exhilaration. For the transation, I said that the author focused more on the man in the second paragraph.</p>
<p>Frustration.. how are you even getting this from paragraph 1. He never explained how he felt when others had already done it. There is no way possible its that. Its either curiosity or exhilaraiton.</p>
<p>It's frustration because in the first paragraph it says things like: "I was jealous that I wouldn't be able to land on the moon, or get to be able to discover new things,"--along those lines. He was frustrated at the fact that he wouldn't be able to discover new things, because he thought everything had already been discovered. He wouldn't be curious if he knew everything.</p>
<p>On the other questions, I chose the same answers.</p>
<p>he never said jealous. I am 100% sure he did not. He said that he thought he knew the world from the books he read. He was also saying how he had wanted to just go do everything.</p>
<p>OH i was confused out of crap. Was he "conceding a point" when he said something about the small animals on the shore?</p>
<p>Okay.. we're probably talking about different passages.</p>
<p>Was this the diver one?</p>
<p>Ya the oceanographer one.. the conceding point was the one when he said how he believed the sea ground to be full of life.</p>
<p>i think its curiosity it hink exhiliration is too extreme</p>
<p>Wait if it did say jealous... then i am completely wrong and it is frustration. I could of sworn though it did not say that. And my reasoning for not curiosity - he never actually seemed like "Oh how cool would it be to be firs ton the moon". He seemed more like saying "I wanted to be first on the moon" which seemed a bit more exhilaration imo. Oh well we will just see.</p>
<p>gyros did u choose circumstantial for a vocab sc? and yes it didnt say jealous he was envious of sailors</p>
<p>Damn i guess it was frustration. I remember circumstancial but it was not one of the correct answers.. give me some other choices and i can tell you what it was.</p>
<p>it was caprcious then i was 50 50 :(; did u get a passage about lawyers?</p>
<p>Yes i did get lawyers. Capricious also was not the write answer.. give me one more choice. I remember capricious and circumstancial.. maybe i am thinking of the wrong one. just try to remember another choice.</p>
<p>do u remember the questoin about the psychoogical anchors and how closing statemetns lift them and make jurors think certain ways and it asked how would passage 2 respond? I chose that lawyesr have no way of knowing the attitudes of the jurors</p>
<p>yeah i got this questiona bout how would passage 2 respond to passage 1 saying that closing arguments lift the psychological anchors of jurors. I was 50 50 and i chose that lawyers have no way of knowing the attitdues of jurors</p>
<p>I think for that question i put an answer that included "manipulation"</p>
<p>i think i put illogical argument will not convince the jurors.</p>
<p>It was not capricious. It was implausible.</p>