<p>On the lawyers passages there was a question about two quotes. I put passage 1 said something from a personal someone and passage 2 makes it a generic thing that many people use
also on another question about the comparison between fast foods did you guys put that both passages focus on : travel or commerce.? And finally on that same passage what was the answer to the structure of passage 1 to 2. I put 2 refutes (not the exact word) a claim in passage 1. ANother choice was that passage 2 discusses analogy from passage 1.</p>
<p>Yea i second your first answer. I said On commerce for the second i also put refutes. wierd... i felt like i did extremely ****ty on the entire test</p>
<p>ok lets see
i put
the same as your first answer
commerce
and quote from personal document</p>
<p>i hated that commerce vs travel question, couldn't decide so i just put down commerce.</p>
<p>i second your first answer- it was about the attorneys views. the first cited one attorney, the second was a general view of all attorneys</p>
<p>it was commerce</p>
<p>i don't believe the word was refutes.. it was more like challenges an argument?</p>
<p>To back up commerce, neither of the authors speak negatively about travel, they are complaing about how big business and commerce makes the highways look terrible. Confident Commerce was correct</p>
<p>Sum33th. About your answer to the lawyer question. The second also cites an attorney. saying, "an attorney had said 'give me the facts and i will make it into a story.'" or something along those line. I specifically remeber the second passage refering to an attorney actually saying those words</p>
<p>Did both indicate many people feel juries are easily manipulated?</p>
<p>yes.. i put easily manipulated, changed that one at the last minute</p>
<p>I am begining to feel a lot better about my answers...</p>
<p>ach44: i don't remember it like that.. the first passage cited one specifically addressed attorney, and the second passage used "attorney" in a general sense</p>
<p>What do you guys think -1 or -2 is on CR?</p>
<p>It did speak about attorneys in general. I agree with you in that. But my point is that they BOTH cited an attorney to use their quote. Therefore making the first part of that answer worth null</p>
<p>I do not feel good about my scores at all. mainly because i just didnt study at all. But talking with CCers is making me feel like i messed up on the easy ones.</p>
<p>I think the first one was:</p>
<p>"passage 1 quotes a specific attorney's view, passage 2 makes a generic claim one might make"</p>
<p>IDK. Dont listen to me. this is my second Reasoning, i didnt study and i didnt do well my first time. Just have a good IQ. only thing i got goin for me</p>
<p>I am still worrying about triumvirate (although I put it). I thought it was too ez for a hard lvl question.</p>
<p>did you put discursive for the repitalian eye that protects it from sand</p>
<p>i was choosing between inert and discursive</p>
<p>the answer was definitely triumvirate, gyros</p>
<p>The answer is triumvirate. i was deciding between triumvirate and Triage. and put triage. LOL</p>