<p>The lawyer passage was pretty hard, and it's all pretty much a blur to me now. All I remember is one question about manipulating jurors. Does anyone remember questions or answers from that section?</p>
<p>Do you remeber sayign that the second author was refuting a claim made by the first passage. I am pretty sure that was wrong though</p>
<p>i remember that, but i was afraid to put that answer. isaid he acknowledge the alternate perspective of lawyers.</p>
<p>Did you put an answer that said something like "While passage 2 made a generic phrase that lawyers would say..."</p>
<p>yah that is the right answer</p>
<p>do u guys remember that lawyer q about how closing arguments lift the psychological anchors of jurors and it wasilke how would passage 2 respond
i said that its wrong becuase there is no way for a lawyer to nkow the attitdues of the juror</p>