<p>Wait, there wasn't a polar question!!!</p>
<p>We had the linear velocity function, the auditorium show thing, the diver, then the differential equation, WHAT WAS QUESTION 5 I DON’T REMEMBER THIS ONE! then, taylor series. were there two tests?</p>
<p>I didn’t have polar either.</p>
<p>Weird…CB didn’t continue the pattern.</p>
<p>The whole test was weird.</p>
<p>Not even an area b/n curves on the FRQ.</p>
<p>I agree. sorry, the polar was on 2005. I was freaking out for a sec. yeah, I was REALLY surprised. I swear, I thought the first one would be area b/n curves and volume.</p>
<p>“I swear, I thought the first one would be area b/n curves and volume”</p>
<p>^Same here! Then I thought maybe we would convert that to polar or something.</p>
<p>^Same. CB kept the trend of a FRQ using a table of values.
But I was also expecting at least one with Area, Volume, or maybe a slope field.</p>
<p>There was the differential equations one (which I’m glad because it’s always worth 5 points!)</p>
<p>YES! No solids of revolution, or convergence/divergence tests either!
I was quite pleased with the latter.</p>
<p>“or convergence/divergence tests either!”</p>
<p>^There was on 6 for me…but they told you what test to use.</p>
<p>Oh, right. I didn’t count that one because they said it was a ratio test.</p>
<p>ya, overall i though the test was rather easy (but i screwed up my numbering on the calc portion leaving one to many blanks at 85). there were a lot of missed topics, like rotation around axis and polar questions, both of which i am good at and like to do. but overall, with some minor mistakes, i think the exam was definitely doable.</p>