5 Myths of Law School Admissions

<p>
[quote]
Try civility; might be hard at first, but practice makes perfect.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>A bitter pill to swallow for you then, eh?</p>

<p>
[quote]
That doesn't even make sense. (rolls eyes)

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I am not going to argue anymore with regard to your attitude, for fear of committing a tu quoque, but you are definitely not above the standard you set. Shall we just agree that your present remark is self-referentially incoherent?</p>

<p>
[quote]
But it does nothing to rebut the theory that transfers are not per-se negative. What you said does not go to the heart of the issue.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Once again, I do not think the theory claims that transferring is negative in an absolute manner; ostensibly, the small steps did not appear to work. Hopefully, belaboring my point will:</p>

<p>
[quote]
The fact is that the majority of transfers are not going to Ivy-League institutions, so the author's argument is prima facie applicable.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>With hanna's example, you are merely grasping at straws. I do not even think that the theory is intended for individuals like her; my justification for this inference is because the majority of transfers do not enter Ivy-League institutions, and I am willing to bet that the majority of transfers probably do not even enter top tier institutions. Do not let the disproportionately high ambitions of CC posters fool you. </p>

<p>
[quote]
What you said does not go to the heart of the issue.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>An intellectual sleight-of-hand; using an exception to the rule for a theory that was clearly not absolute does not refute it. Do not try to conceal your error.</p>

<p>For instance, one could argue that a candidate for Harvard Law School requires a 170 or above on the LSAT, yet another could refute the argument by showing a student that was admitted with a 165. That does not alter the non-ethical normative arrangement of the original argument, it merely provides an exception to the rule, and should not be taken as a rule in and of itself. The preliminary claim that a 170 or above on the LSAT is required to be competitive still stands prima facie, since the majority of students admitted into HLS possess such a score.</p>