<p>To prove that a transfer is per-se negative, you would have to demonstrate either:</p>
<ol>
<li> that the example I set out is an exception, which requires that you demonstrate a RULE and back it up with statistics.</li>
<li> that in my example, the person would have done better had it not been for the transfer - i.e. "but for" causation.</li>
</ol>
<p>Given that neither is present, I stand behind my assertion that your arguments are not rational and really are not relevant.</p>
<p>Find the 2000 edition of Robert Miller's "Law School Confidential." Flip to the interview with the Penn admissions dean. She explicitly stated that transfer students look good to her. </p>
<p>Ball is in your court; burden of proof is on you.</p>