<p>Singledad, I do not have any first hand knowledge of Northeastern's coop program, but I would expect that it would be among the best in the nation simply for the following reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>Northeastern has been doing this for a long time</li>
<li>The co-op is an integral part of their school structure, carried through to all academic programs</li>
<li>Northeastern is a very large university, with many resources</li>
<li>The university is located in a major urban area that is also geographically close to many other major urban areas</li>
<li>Although it is not a top-tier university, Northeastern has a strong reputation and is fairly well known</li>
</ol>
<p>All this translates into a school where priority is placed on assuring that the coop program works well, and where there would tend to be a very well developed network of contacts and opportunities for students. Northeastern's program would not work unless they had a good track record for placing students into co-op positions - and unless those positions had strong educational value for the students. </p>
<p>If you compare those criteria with other colleges on the US News list, you would see that Northeastern would almost by definition have one of the strongest programs. For example, if you compare it to Antioch -- Antioch probably has an equally strong commitment to its co-op program, and may be equally well-known and well established -- but Antioch's midwest location would make it more difficult for students to search for and interview for positions, and Antioch's very small size is going to limit the size of the current network and set of contacts that will help students find positions. </p>
<p>If you look at many other colleges on the list - for example, Cal Poly or Evergreen -- you know that while they may have good co-op programs, that is not the main underpinning of their educational philosophy. That is, at Northeastern, the vast majority of students are there for the co-op experience and do the co-ops, while that is not true for most of the colleges on the list. So, you reasonably could not expect the level of support to be the same at a university that is merely offering a co-op option, as opposed to building their entire curriculum around it. </p>
<p>That does not mean that a student couldn't have a good experience at another university -- depending on the student's personal qualities and interests, many of the other universities might be a better fit. Nor does it mean that Northeastern would be better educationally -- to the contrary, the high prioritizing of the co-op could lead to an educational environment that was less supportive of pure academic pursuits, both in and out of the classroom. </p>
<p>So I guess the first question really is what is your daughter's area of interest? What type of work does she envision herself doing on co-op? For example - my daughter is also interested in Northeastern, but her area of interest is politics and international relations -- so for her D.C. is a stronger draw than Boston, and American is looking like a place that is more likely to open the door for the kind of work experience she would like, even though it doesn't have a "co-op" program. </p>
<p>Also, keep in mind that many colleges will accomodate semester or year-long internships as an alternative to study abroad, and many colleges also do have ways that students earn credit for work experience and internships. Northeastern's program does also generally entail a longer time frame for graduation -- 5 years for a 4 year degree -- whereas at a university without an official co-op program, it may be very possible to get significant internship experience during the college years, and in the 5th year be embarking on a career while peers are Northeastern still have yet to complete their degree.</p>