<p>If someone does something awful to you or a loved one, is it justifiable to do it to them (an eye for an eye)?</p>
<p>Or is it still morally wrong?</p>
<p>Depends. Sounds to me like the person is getting revenge, rather than serving justice, so yes, morally wrong.</p>
<p>Depends.</p>
<p>Case A:
Your besty was killed in a car accident. Do you then go and try to kill the person who accidentally kill your friend? </p>
<p>No. </p>
<p>Case B:
Someone killed your besty in purpose. Do you then kill the murderer?</p>
<p>No. Bring the case to the court and make sure the convicted will be sentenced to a life-time thingy.</p>
<p>“An eye for an eye makes the world go blind” - Gandhi</p>
<p>Yes</p>
<p>Death Penalty when its like a serial killer</p>
<p>Depends on a lot of variables. There is no blanket answer. Debating morality is pointless :p</p>
<p>Never okay. Vigilante justice doesn’t work*. Do your best to let the legal system to its thing or just bide your time, don’t take matters into your own hand.</p>
<p>*Unless you are Batman.</p>
<p>Hammurabi’s code would never work in such a controversial society. Lol.
^^^^By the way, did you just say besty? Ew. xD</p>
<p>yep. I want to say ‘mate’, but that’s too Australian lol. :D</p>
<p>No. Not as an individual. The government is supposed to punish wrongdoers.</p>
<p>“Debating morality is pointless” is a verrrrrry false statement in the eyes of a Republican.</p>
<p>^Well we don’t actually know who’s republican unless they make it known.</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Man, these are easy.</p>
<p>hamurabi’s law is arcane and i don’t think it’s morally correct to get “eye for an eye”. what you should do is confront this person and mediate your situation like gentlemen</p>