<p>I feel the whole extremely preppy factor has been over-exaggerated on CC. I orginally-resided in Oakland,CA. If I had listened to that common review without visiting, every nearly every Northeastern LAC would be off my list.</p>
<p>I mean, visit the school and see for yourself. It will all depend on the crowd you are with, but judging clothing and income doesn't really indicate the mantality and level-headedness of the student body. </p>
<p>To address some school I often hear mentioned...people have continuously referred to LACs like Amherst, Wellesley, Colgate and elite privates likeEmory, and Stanford as preppy and rich. So what exactly does that mean...</p>
<p>I grew up at Stanford, and there is no overall tone of the student body on campus and if always depended on the people you associated with at where you were. In one-corner, the black greek life (Alpha's!) will dominate, while another side can be athletes on overdrive, another corner can be World Asia, and on the other end could be the J Crew, but then their are thousands between that don't even clique into a category except for individuality.</p>
<p>After growing up at Stanford, staying at Emory & Colgate, living by Wellesley, attending Amherst I can tell you that all the schools followed that general pattern and the notion of complete preppy, popped collar, rich white university was blown way out of proportion.</p>
<p>Just note that this pigeon-holed categorization does not tell you squat about the social climate of the campus. It can range from rich people be level-headed to self-centered egotistical to philanthropic to simply flaunting and throwing dollars in the sky.</p>
<p>You need to visit to judge. Don't eliminate based on this one quote. Being black-latino and, even the most diverse and best rated private institutions for African-Americans recieved this same "preppy" review. I say take these comments lightly and with a grain of salt.</p>