<p>I've heard generally the same things about these classes. Only difference is that I've been able to read reviews about Lew (prof. for A&O SCI 3) but all the LING 1 class has listed for its professor is THE STAFF.</p>
<p>So, from experience, which of these would be the better class to take?</p>
<p>I’m taking Ling 1 this quarter with Schuh, and I’d definitely recommend the class if he’s teaching it again. Email him (<a href=“mailto:schuh@humnet.ucla.edu”>schuh@humnet.ucla.edu</a>) and ask if he’ll be teaching it again next quarter. If it turns out that he is, and you have any questions, feel free to PM me.</p>
<p>I loved both of those classes, but A&O 3 was my favorite class I’ve taken at UCLA. I had Professor Brix, though.</p>
<p>I would take A&3 3 over Ling 1. I just think it’s an easier class. It’s a set grading scale and you can work together on the quizes. The exams are multiple choice with some fill-in questions.</p>
<p>Ling 1 with Prof. Schuh is more work than I expected. It also depends on you TA since you’re going to have to go to office hours for help on the HW.</p>
<p>It will depend on what area you’re stronger. If you are a science major then A&O 3 will probably be easier or vice-versa.</p>